The Terrifying History and Implications of Space Weapons

Darian West
Operations Research Bit
4 min readFeb 27, 2024

With the Prospect of Putin’s New Wonderweapon, What Have We Learned?

Depiction of the “Rods from God” Superweapon

The prospect of space weaponization has been a topic of interest and concern for many years but the idea has surged to the forefront of current conversation because of Putin’s plan to put a nuclear weapon into space in order to annihilate global communications. The idea of weaponizing space dates back to the Cold War era when both the United States and the Soviet Union were exploring the possibilities of expanding their military capabilities beyond Earth’s atmosphere.

The first space weapon was launched by the Soviet Union in 1968, a military satellite named Истребитель спутников, ИС, meaning “destroyer of satellites”. The US followed suit in 1985 with the deployment of the Space Shuttle program’s “Dual-Use Satellite,” which could function as a reconnaissance satellite and as a platform for anti-satellite weapons.

The Destroyer of Satellites

The Istrebitel Sputnik (IS) or “Destroyer of Satellites” was the Soviet Union’s first space weapon, launched in 1968. The IS was designed to target and destroy enemy satellites using an onboard nuclear reactor to power a particle beam weapon. The IS was part of the Soviet Union’s Almaz program, which aimed to develop military space stations. While the IS was never used in a hostile capacity, its development marked a significant step in the weaponization of space.

The Manned Spaceborne Manipulator

The Dual-Use Satellite, also known as the “Manned Spaceborne Manipulator,” was the United States’ response to the Soviet Union’s IS. Deployed in 1985 as part of the Space Shuttle program, the Dual-Use Satellite was designed to function as both a reconnaissance satellite and a platform for anti-satellite weapons. The satellite was equipped with a robotic arm that could be used to manipulate and disable enemy satellites. Like the IS, the Dual-Use Satellite was never used in a hostile capacity.

The Rods from God

One of the most controversial theories regarding space weaponization is the “Rods from God” or “Kinetic Energy Weapons” theory. According to this theory, the United States has developed and deployed tungsten rods, each weighing several tons, into Earth’s orbit. These rods can be directed towards a specific target and, upon re-entry, would impact the target with devastating force, similar to that of a large nuclear weapon but with the benefit of being practically impossible to stop or even detect. The theory suggests that these “Rods from God” could be used as a space-based weapon to destroy enemy infrastructure or military capabilities. However, the US government has neither confirmed nor denied the existence of such a program.

Project Starfish

Project Starfish, also known as Operation Fishbowl, was a series of high-altitude nuclear tests conducted by the United States in 1962 as part of its overall nuclear weapons testing program. The project was aimed at studying the effects of nuclear explosions in space, particularly the impact on military communications and navigation systems. A total of five tests were conducted, with the most famous being the Starfish Prime test, which took place on July 9, 1962. The test involved the detonation of a 1.4 megaton thermonuclear bomb at an altitude of about 250 miles above the Pacific Ocean. The explosion created an artificial radiation belt around the Earth, which disrupted satellite operations and caused electrical damage on the ground in Hawaii, located about 900 miles away from the test site. The tests were controversial and led to increased international scrutiny of nuclear weapons testing, ultimately contributing to the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1963.

International Frameworks

The weaponization of space has significant implications for global security. The ability to destroy or disrupt satellites could have devastating effects on a nation’s communication, navigation, and surveillance capabilities. In a world heavily reliant on satellite technology, the loss of even a few key satellites could have catastrophic consequences.

One of the most significant concerns is the potential for a space arms race. If one nation were to develop and deploy space weapons, other nations may feel compelled to follow suit, leading to a dangerous escalation of military capabilities in space. This could result in a destabilized global security environment, where the risk of conflict is heightened.

The international community has taken steps to prevent the weaponization of space. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 prohibits the placement of weapons of mass destruction in orbit around the Earth, on the Moon, or on any other celestial body. However, the treaty does not address other types of weapons, leaving a gap in the legal framework governing space weaponization.

Efforts to strengthen the legal regime governing space weaponization have been ongoing. In 2008, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the “PAROS,” or the “Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space,” resolution. The PAROS calls for the negotiation of a treaty to prevent the weaponization of space, but so far, no such treaty has been concluded.

The topic of weaponizing space has surged dramatically with intelligence rumors that Vladimir Putin is planning to launch a nuclear weapon into space, threatening global communications systems of all types in an effort to undermine the West. The effects of such a blast would almost certainly destroy all satellites within certain orbital paths, leading to a cascading debris field that would probably impact satellite launches for decades or centuries.

For more information about nuclear space weapons:

--

--

Darian West
Operations Research Bit

I ferret out things that interest me and then I write about them with fervor. Love me.