UT Austin’s Return-to-Office Mandate: Where’s the Data?

TakeBack_UTAustin
6 min readAug 25, 2024

--

In recent months, The University of Texas at Austin has made headlines for its controversial decision to implement a rigid return-to-office (RTO) mandate for its staff. This decision, which affects thousands of dedicated employees, has been met with widespread concern and criticism. One of the most troubling aspects of this mandate is the glaring absence of data or studies to support it.

A Decision Based on Politics, Not Evidence

Multiple sources have now confirmed what many suspected: the RTO mandate was driven by the opinions of just two regents rather than being the result of a thorough, evidence-based decision-making process. This revelation is deeply concerning for an institution that prides itself on academic rigor and research excellence.

As a top-tier university, UT Austin should be setting the standard for data-driven decision-making. Instead, leadership has failed to provide any substantive rationale, productivity studies, or credible data to justify a policy that significantly and negatively impacts the personal and professional lives of its staff.

The data speaks for itself — UT Austin’s staff have proven their ability to drive unprecedented success in a remote or hybrid setting. Any decision that could potentially disrupt this success should be carefully considered and backed by solid evidence.

The Hybrid/Remote Work Era: A Period of Unprecedented Success

While UT Austin’s leadership seems reluctant to examine the data, we’ve taken it upon ourselves to do so. The results are clear: during the period of hybrid and remote work from 2020 through mid-2024, UT Austin has achieved remarkable success across multiple fronts. Let’s look at the evidence:

1. Soaring Rankings

  • UT Austin climbed to #38 among national universities in U.S. News & World Report’s 2021 rankings, up four spots from the previous year.
  • In 2023, UT Austin rose to #32 overall and #9 among public universities in the same rankings.
  • Globally, UT Austin ranked #58 in the 2024 QS World University Rankings, placing it #4 among U.S. public universities.

2. Record-Breaking Student Success

  • Four-year graduation rates have steadily increased, reaching a record 74.5% in 2023, up from 69.9% in 2018–2019.
  • First-year undergraduate retention rose to an impressive 96.1% in 2023.
  • Notably, graduation rates for first-generation and Pell-eligible students have seen significant improvements, with first-generation student graduation rates rising from 39.7% in 2013 to 66.1% in 2023.

3. Research Excellence

  • UT Austin ranks #6 among U.S. universities for research financed by the National Science Foundation (FY2022).
  • Research expenditures reached $1.04 billion in FY2023.
  • The university saw 4,643 externally sponsored projects in FY2023.

4. Growing Demand and Diversity

  • A record 66,109 students applied to attend UT Austin in fall 2023, a 10% increase from 2022.
  • Total enrollment rose to 53,082 in fall 2023, up from 52,384 the previous year.
  • The percentage of Hispanic undergraduates increased to 28.2% in fall 2023, solidifying UT Austin’s position as one of the country’s largest and most prestigious Hispanic-serving institutions.

The Crucial Role of Staff in UT Austin’s Success

It’s important to emphasize that these remarkable achievements didn’t happen in a vacuum. They are the direct result of the tireless efforts of UT Austin’s dedicated staff, who have continued to excel in their roles during the period of remote and hybrid work.

A prime example of staff-driven achievements is the Office of Student Success. This staff-led office has been instrumental in driving these impressive improvements in student outcomes. Working collaboratively with campus partners, the Office of Student Success provides students with vital academic and advising support, wraparound services, and resources to help navigate institutional requirements.

The impact of their work is clear:

  • They provide crucial data and support to colleges and schools, directly contributing to improved graduation, retention, and persistence rates.
  • Their efforts have been key in streamlining the educational experience for all undergraduates.
  • The remarkable increases in four-year graduation rates, especially among first-generation and Pell-eligible students, can be attributed in large part to the dedicated work of this office.

It’s worth noting that the Office of Student Success, like many other staff-led departments, has achieved these outcomes while operating in a hybrid or remote work environment. This success underscores the ability of UT Austin’s staff to maintain and even improve their productivity and effectiveness, regardless of their physical work location.

As we look to the future, we must ask ourselves: Is this return-to-office mandate truly in the best interest of UT Austin, its staff, and most importantly, its students? The data from the hybrid/remote work period tells a story of remarkable achievement and progress. Now, as staff members are forced to return to crowded, loud cubicles, bearing the added costs and stress this mandate carries, we must wonder if this level of excellence can be maintained.

The Irony of Ignoring Success

The irony is palpable. During a period when staff were largely working in hybrid or remote settings, UT Austin achieved unprecedented success. The university saw improvements in rankings, student outcomes, research output, and diversity metrics. All of this was accomplished with the support of dedicated staff members working flexibly.

Yet, despite these clear indicators of success, university leadership has chosen to disregard this data in favor of an arbitrary mandate that could potentially disrupt the very systems that have contributed to these achievements.

A Call for Transparency and Evidence-Based Decision Making

As members of the UT Austin community, we call on President Hartzell and the university leadership to:

  1. Provide transparent, data-driven justification for the RTO mandate.
  2. Explain how this decision aligns with the university’s demonstrated success during the hybrid/remote work period.
  3. Conduct a thorough study on the potential impacts of this mandate on staff productivity, well-being, and retention.
  4. Consider the broader implications for the university’s continued success and competitiveness.
  5. Recognize and value the contributions of staff members who have driven UT Austin’s success, regardless of their work location.

UT Austin’s motto is “What starts here changes the world.” Let’s ensure that what starts here is based on evidence, not politics. Our university’s future success depends on it.

The achievements of the past few years are a testament to the dedication and effectiveness of UT Austin’s staff, regardless of their work location. It’s time for university leadership to recognize this reality and make decisions that truly support the entire UT community. The data speaks for itself — UT Austin’s staff have proven their ability to drive unprecedented success in a remote or hybrid setting. Any decision that could potentially disrupt this success should be carefully considered and backed by solid evidence.

As we look to the future, we must ask ourselves: Is this return-to-office mandate truly in the best interest of UT Austin, its staff, and most importantly, its students? The data from the hybrid/remote work period tells a story of remarkable achievement and progress. Now, as staff members are forced to return to crowded, loud cubicles, bearing the added costs and stress this mandate carries, we must wonder if this level of excellence can be maintained.

For the sake of our students and the continued success of UT Austin, we sincerely hope that the productivity, creativity, and level of student support will hold up under these new conditions. However, it’s clear that this situation didn’t have to unfold this way. The university’s leadership had a choice — to follow the data and continue supporting the flexible work arrangements that have clearly benefited the institution or to bow to political pressure at the expense of its dedicated staff and, potentially, its impressive trajectory of success.

As we move forward, we urge the university leadership to reconsider this decision, to prioritize evidence over politics, and to remember that the heart of UT Austin’s success lies not in the physical location of its staff but in their dedication, expertise, and unwavering commitment to excellence.

Follow Take Back UT Austin on X

--

--

TakeBack_UTAustin
TakeBack_UTAustin

Written by TakeBack_UTAustin

Advocates for reversing the anti-staff, anti-student policy decisions taken by UT Austin's senior leadership.