DAOs: MakerDAO receives collateral application from US-based bank, Lido sees surge in demand driven by Aave collateral usage, Balancer’s veBAL governance system kicks off, Gnosis’s GIP-27 is live, Idle’s IIP-20 is active, Colony announces DAO Club, and more!

Paradigm
Paradigm

--

Biweekly report on decentralized autonomous organizations vol.22, 20th March — 2d April

TL;DR

  • MakerDAO receives a collateral application from a US-based bank. All 9 March ratification polls that entered the monthly cycle passed. New MKR vesting streams and compensations executive proposal is live
  • Lido’s expanding lead in Ethereum liquid staking via Aave integration
  • Aave’s on-chain vote to optimize the rate curve for ETH & improve revenue generation for the protocol was successful. Llama proposed a treasury swap with Balancer
  • Colony announced DAO Club — a new community initiative that brings together active DAO builders, Web3 entrepreneurs, and innovators
  • Balancer is now using the veModel, veBAL activation proposal approved. The community considering DAO multisig signer replacements
  • BadgerDAO’s BIPs 86 & 88 passed. Following the successful passing of BIP 87, 5% of CVX voting power was used to vote for the Badger/wBTC pool. A treasury policy BIP is on the forum for feedback
  • Another MolochDAO grants round is brewing. Proposal submission starts April 4th
  • Compound proposals 091, 093, 094 failed, 090 & 092 executed, 095 is live
  • The Idle community votes on IIP-20. The proposal will activate the Gauges model resulting in adding meta-governance features to IDLE token
  • Gnosis’s GIP-27: Gnosis Guild treasury allocation proposal is live. GIPs 24 & 28 passed, and GIP-33 is on the forum
  • Bancor to release the Bancor 3 code repository in the first week of April. BIP 16–21 going live soon
  • Nexus Mutual completed the single largest treasury deposit into Bancor. While the immunefi matching bug bounty program renewal proposal is live on the snapshot for voting
  • mStable MCCP 18 & MCCP 19 passed
  • The Uniswap community votes to authorize the deployment of Uniswap V3 to Moonbeam
  • PoolTogether PTIP-65 & 67 passed. Deposit Delegator is live
  • API3 will deploy Beacon data feeds to Avalanche. ESG Enterprise deploys Airnode to their API, bringing ESG risk management data to smart contracts
  • Synthetix’s SCCP-175, 176 & 177 are live on the snapshot. Voting in the Synthetix Council elections open till April 5th
  • The Yam community votes on YIP-106: Deposit 50% of treasury ETH in Yearn stETH vault
  • PieDAO’s [PIP-73] BTC++ Health-Check is live
  • Gitcoin grants round 13 ended. Over 4.6M will be distributed to public goods as part of the round
  • Bridge protocol Stargate Finance launches, with initial token auction fully purchased by Alameda Research in a single transaction
  • Juno core team members and community rally around compromise proposal, removing Juno whale’s voting power while negotiations continue
  • Solana based stablecoin project Cash is exploited, with hacker’s return of funds for all users with <100,000 balance creating difficult conundrum for project maintainers
  • Georgetown professor offers framework for crypto-native disclosures
  • Teller begins offering unsecured stablecoin loans to Singapore residents using traditional credit scoring
  • Larry Ellison’s SailGP and Near Protocol to create a DAO for sports team ownership
  • Lemonade is working with Avalanche, Chainlink on weather insurance for farmers
  • Active proposals: Aave, Compound, Curve, GnosisDAO, Index Coop, Idle, Nexus Mutual, LidoDAO, Synthetix, PieDAO, Uniswap, Yam Finance
  • New & ongoing discussions: Balancer, GitcoinDAO, mStable, MakerDAO, Yearn Finance, BancorDAO, Akropolis, PoolTogether, API3, KyberDAO, Kleros, Badger DAO
  • And more!

Overview

Blockchain technology is already radically transforming the financial system. However, properties such as trustlessness and immutability aren’t only useful in monetary applications. Another potential application is governance. Blockchains could enable entirely new types of organizations that can run autonomously without the need for coordination by a central entity.

“Instead of a hierarchical structure managed by a set of humans interacting in person and controlling property via the legal system, a decentralized organization involves a set of humans interacting with each other according to a protocol specified in code, and enforced on the blockchain.”Vitalik Buterin

DAO stands for “decentralized autonomous organization” and can be described as an open-source blockchain protocol governed by a set of rules, created by its elected members, that automatically execute certain actions without the need for intermediaries.

In simple terms, a DAO is an organization that is governed by computer code and programs. As such, it has the ability to function autonomously, without the need for a central authority.

Like how DeFi is programmable money and how NFTs are programmable media, DAOs are programmable organizations of people.

DAOs Ecosystem Statistics

Deepdao.io

Top DAOs

Like two weeks ago, the rating is headed by Uniswap and BitDAO.

Deepdao.io

Global stats

Boardroom

Leading DAOs

Boardroom

Frameworks

Aragon

Recent blog posts

How we DAO — Aragon Network — Head of Ecosystem — Ivan Fartunov:

The Commons Stack

Commons Stack Review: Sprint 35:

The DAOist CDMX: Griff talks about goal to create micro-economies:

Tribute Labs (OpenLaw)

Aaron Wright: DAO’s-Decentralized Autonomous Organizations:

Governance

Aave

Deepdao.io
Boardroom

Recent blog posts

Active proposals

Closed proposals

On-chain votes:

New and ongoing discussions

Latest governance topics on governance forum.

Badger DAO

Deepdao.io
Boardroom

Closed proposals

New and ongoing discussions: Badger Discord

To read more about the different proposals and take part in the decision, check out the governance forum.

Behind the Scenes of the Huge Upgrade to our Locked CVX Vault:

Degen DD: How to Assess the Risk of New DeFi Protocols:

Index Coop

Deepdao.io
Boardroom

Active proposals

Closed proposals

New and ongoing discussions

Find latest Index Coop proposals here.

To read more about the different proposals and take part in the decision, check out the governance forum.

What is Metagovernance? DeFi’s Sleeping Giant:

Kleros

Deepdao.io
Boardroom

There were no active KIPs these weeks.

To read more about the different proposals and take part in the decision, check out the governance forum.

Kleros 2.0 Demo:

MakerDAO

Closed Polls (4 Polls Ended Mar 31)

Closed Polls (9 Polls Ended Mar 28)

Executive

New and ongoing discussions

Read more about the different proposals and take part in the decision.

Governance Portal, Governance Forum

Governance and Risk | Ep. 184:

Issue Discussion Call # 5 | Budget Modification Process:

The Bullish Case for MKR | Sam MacPherson, Niklas Kunkel & monetsupply.eth:

Yearn Finance

Deepdao.io

Recent blog posts

Boardroom

There were no active proposals these weeks.

Check out the latest YIPs discussions here.

MISC

Lido Sees Surge in Demand Driven by Aave Collateral Usage

The recent addition of stETH to the Aave money market has enabled leveraged staking strategies that have widened Lido’s lead in total staked Ether.

While Lido has long been a market leader within the Ethereum staking space, recent integrations with the Aave lending market have turbocharged adoption and deposit volumes. This has had the effect of widening Lido’s lead in total Ether staked (even exceeding top centralized exchanges such as Kraken and Coinbase), while also significantly increasing systemic leverage and raising key questions about validator centralization. We dig into the recent market moves and potential impacts below.

Aave listing: stETH was initially added to the Aave v2 protocol on Ethereum mainnet at the end of February. This followed roughly several months of discussion in the Aave governance forum, as well as development work to allow the proposed market to conform with stETH’s non-standard rebasing mechanism.

Source: Aave governance dashboard

stETH was listed with a 75% liquidation threshold, which was likely optimized to mitigate price risk of users supplying stETH as collateral to borrow stablecoins. But in the following weeks, we’ve begun to see a different preferred trade take prominence: supplying stETH collateral, borrowing ETH (at a lower rate), and then staking the borrowed ETH back into stETH to increase the total yield earned.

Leveraged ETH staking: With maximum permitted borrowing of up to 70% of collateral value, defi users quickly realized they could potentially earn as much as 3x staking rewards by continuously borrowing ETH from Aave and resupplying stETH. While initial usage was limited, over the past week these positions have exploded and total stETH deposits on Aave now total over $1 billion.

There are also several structured products that are competing to capture this market demand, while abstracting away position management and reducing transaction costs required to establish this position. Galleon DAO and Beverage Finance (two micro-cap asset management protocols) were the first to capitalize with their recently launched ETHMAXY leveraged index product (targetting 3.09x leverage of stETH vs ETH). Larger competitor Index Coop is also planning to release a similar product in the near future. This huge inflow has helped push up ETH borrowing and lending rates on Aave, from a previous equilibrium of near 0% to around 2.5% for borrowing and 0.4% for depositing ETH. This has reduced maximum expected returns of leveraged ETH staking positions from as high as 12% at launch to current rates of around 7% (still nearly double the 4% base return offered by Lido).

Source: Aave market dashboard

Changing Aave market dynamics and defi risks: This marked increase in ETH borrowing activity could represent a windfall for the Aave protocol in a few ways. First, Aave captures 10% of all interest paid on ETH borrowing positions via their reserve factor. While this is primarily charged to help cover potential loan losses if underwater positions can’t be effectively liquidated, any excess reserves can be captured by the Aave protocol and used for governance approved initiatives (eg. buybacks, investments, payroll, etc). In addition, interest earned on ETH collateral helps offset the cost of borrowing other assets from the protocol, effectively subsidizing usage across the rest of Aave’s markets. With ETH serving as Aave’s most important collateral asset (primarily supporting users borrowing stablecoins), this source of intrinsic yield could help the protocol wean itself off of liquidity incentives without adversely impacting utilization.

However, this tailwind comes with significant tradeoffs. At $1 billion in stETH collateral and growing, Aave is already exposed to potentially fatal levels of systemic risk if Lido were to be compromised via a hack or governance attack. This could cause contagion across Aave’s other markets, as defaulted ETH loans would impact the true value of aETH used as collateral for a large part of Aave’s loan book. And even a less severe loss, such as a moderate slashing even on Lido’s validators, could lead to market dislocation with forced selling of stETH causing its value to fall far below 1:1 parity with ETH.

Source: DAI Stats

As one of the largest depositors in the Aave market via the DAI direct deposit module, Maker would also face systemic levels of risk from this sort of contagion and default playing out (in addition to the $100 million in direct Lido exposure Maker holds through stETH and steCRV collateralized vault types). Both the benefits and risks of the stETH integration are likely to be accentuated with a new governance proposal pushed forward by the team at Instadapp (which offers Aave leverage integrations through their smart contract wallet infrastructure). The proposal would adjust the ETH borrowing rate curve (which determines borrow rates as a function of utilization, or percent of the market’s assets currently being borrowed), lowering interest rates to support higher efficiency. Assuming this proposal is adopted and the ETH market reaches equilibrium around the target rate of 70% utilization and 3% borrowing rates.

Consensus and base layer centralization risks: While it has been largely absent from the above discussions, Lido’s dominance in liquid staking is beginning to cause concern about Ethereum base layer decentralization and consensus stability. While Lido bills itself as a decentralized liquid staking protocol, it still has several points of weakness. Key parts of the protocol including screening acceptable validators is performed via the Lido DAO, which is in turn controlled by LDO token holders. The LDO token has an extremely concentrated distribution, centered very heavily on founders and seed investors, with participation from additional investors later but relatively low free float on the open market.

The validator set has been widened and continues to expand over time, but currently all of Lido’s ETH stake is distributed across only a few dozen professional validators. Certain competitors, particularly Rocket Pool, support less concentrated validator distributions by allowing permissionless entry into the validator set secured by economic incentives, rather than DAO review and participant reputation.

As Lido’s market share grows, it may become more difficult for competitors to break in and gain integrations considering stETH’s immense liquidity network effects. While Rocketpool’s struggles are arguably made worse by their refusal to offer any protocol funded liquidity incentives, the Aave lending integration may help stETH separate further from competitors (users can earn nearly 2x returns through leverage, without relying on Lido funded incentives).

In a market that seems to heavily favor incumbents over challengers, the best strategy for addressing base layer centralization may be focusing on protocol improvements to Lido itself. This also serves as an interesting example of transmission of centralization risk between different layers of the crypto tech stack, with application layer decisions made by DAOs significantly influencing base layer consensus.

Sushiswap Releases Trident AMM Protocol on Polygon

After facing long delays, Sushiswap’s Trident AMM should give the project a much needed boost and introduce greater competition into the decentralized exchange landscape.

When it was originally announced last summer, Sushiswap’s Trident exchange protocol gained significant attention and was lauded as a serious competitor to Uniswap v3. But this excitement dissipated quickly, with collapsing price of the SUSHI token, several high profile departures from the core team, and an unsuccessful takeover bid from the Arca hedge fund and Abracadabra stablecoin project all causing upheaval. As recently as this month, many were wondering if the project would even ship at all.

The Sushi team has allayed these concerns with a preview launch of their AMM framework on Polygon. Initially, this deployment will only support an upgraded and standardized version of the classic Uniswap v2 style liquidity pool; two assets per pool each weighted with 50% of liquidity, and the traditional X*Y=K formula for determining swap pricing. But over time, Sushiswap plans to add at least 3 additional pool types: concentrated liquidity (similar to Uniswap v3), stableswaps (similar to Curve), and index pools (similar to Balancer).

With all pool types linked under a single contract interface and UI, Sushiswap should be able to offer a strong value proposition for integrators, liquidity providers, and DAOs, while also reducing lead time required for the developers to spin up new pool types in the future. So while trident is shipping months later than expected, it should still give Sushiswap an important boost in the heavily saturated DEX industry.

  • Solana based stablecoin project Cash is exploited, with hacker’s return of funds for all users with <$100,000 balance creating difficult conundrum for project maintainers:
  • Bridge protocol Stargate Finance launches, with initial token auction fully purchased by Alameda Research in a single transaction:
  • Teller begins offering unsecured stablecoin loans to Singapore residents using traditional credit scoring:
  • Juno core team members and community rally around compromise proposal, removing Juno whale’s voting power while negotiations continue:
  • Georgetown professor offers framework for crypto-native disclosures:

Subscribe to Paradigm!

Medium. Twitter. Telegram. Telegram Chat. Reddit. LinkedIn.

Main Sources

Projects’ blogs and forums

Research articles

Boardroom

Snapshot

Tally

That’s all for today! Your feedback is highly appreciated!👥

--

--