Drug Addiction: A Public Health Issue, Not a Crime

Drug addiction is a complex and chronic condition that affects millions of people around the world. It is often misunderstood, stigmatised, and criminalised, leading to negative consequences for individuals, families, and communities. In this article, I will argue that drug addiction should be treated as a public health issue, not a crime, and that we should adopt a more compassionate and evidence-based approach to address it.

What is drug addiction?

Drug addiction is defined by the World Health Organization as “a disorder of the brain that is manifested by compulsive substance use despite harmful consequences”. It is not a moral failing or a lack of willpower, but a medical condition that can be influenced by genetic, biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors. People who suffer from drug addiction often experience changes in their brain structure and function, which affect their ability to control their impulses, make rational decisions, and cope with stress. They also develop tolerance and dependence on the substance, meaning that they need more of it to achieve the same effect and that they experience withdrawal symptoms when they stop using it.

Drug addiction can affect anyone, regardless of age, gender, race, class, or education. However, some people are more vulnerable than others due to various risk factors, such as trauma, poverty, mental illness, peer pressure, or lack of social support. These factors can also make it harder for them to access treatment and recovery services.

Subscribed

What are the harms of drug addiction?

Drug addiction can have serious and harmful consequences for the individual and society. Some of the harms include:

• Physical health problems: Drug addiction can damage various organs and systems in the body, such as the heart, liver, lungs, brain, and immune system. It can also increase the risk of infectious diseases, such as HIV and hepatitis C, through unsafe injection practices or sexual behaviours. Drug overdose is a leading cause of death among people who use drugs.
• Mental health problems: Drug addiction can worsen existing mental health conditions or trigger new ones, such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, or suicidal thoughts. It can also impair cognitive functions, such as memory, attention, and learning.
• Social problems: Drug addiction can affect the person’s relationships with family, friends, co-workers, and society at large. It can lead to isolation, stigma, discrimination, violence, crime, unemployment, homelessness, or incarceration.
• Economic problems: Drug addiction can impose a huge financial burden on the individual and society. It can reduce the person’s productivity and income potential. It can also increase the costs of health care, criminal justice, social welfare, and environmental damage.

What are the current responses to drug addiction?

The current responses to drug addiction vary across countries and regions. However, many of them are based on prohibitionist policies that criminalise the production, possession, and use of certain drugs. These policies are often influenced by moralistic or punitive views that regard drug users as criminals who deserve punishment rather than patients who need help.

However, these policies have proven to be ineffective, counterproductive, and harmful in many ways. Some of the drawbacks include:

• Increasing the supply and demand of drugs: Prohibition creates a lucrative black market for drugs that attracts organised crime groups and fuels violence and corruption. It also drives up the price and purity of drugs, making them more attractive and dangerous for users.
• Reducing the quality and safety of drugs: Prohibition makes it impossible to regulate the production, distribution, and consumption of drugs. This means that users have no way of knowing what they are taking, how much they are taking, or how it will affect them. This increases the risk of adulteration, contamination, and overdose.
• Undermining the human rights and dignity of drug users: Prohibition exposes drug users to various forms of abuse, harassment, and discrimination by law enforcement agents, judicial authorities, health care providers, and society at large. It also deprives them of their right to health, education, work, and social participation.
• Hindering the access to treatment and harm reduction services: Prohibition creates barriers for drug users to seek help for their addiction or related problems. It also discourages or prevents the provision of evidence-based interventions that can reduce the harms of drug use, such as opioid substitution therapy, needle and syringe exchange programs, supervised consumption facilities, or overdose prevention kits.

What are the alternative responses to drug addiction?

The alternative responses to drug addiction are based on public health policies that decriminalise the possession and use of drugs for personal purposes. These policies are often influenced by scientific or humanitarian views that regard drug users as people who need support rather than punishment.

Decriminalisation means that drug users are not subject to criminal sanctions, such as arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment, but may face civil or administrative sanctions, such as fines, warnings, or referrals to treatment or education programs. Decriminalisation does not mean legalisation, which means that drugs are regulated and taxed by the state like alcohol or tobacco.

Several countries have adopted or experimented with decriminalisation policies, such as Portugal, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Uruguay, and Canada. These policies have shown positive results in many aspects. Some of the benefits include:

• Reducing the supply and demand of drugs: Decriminalisation reduces the involvement of criminal groups and the violence and corruption associated with the illegal drug market. It also reduces the price and purity of drugs, making them less attractive and dangerous for users.
• Improving the quality and safety of drugs: Decriminalisation allows for the regulation of the production, distribution, and consumption of drugs. This means that users have more information and control over what they are taking, how much they are taking, and how it will affect them. This reduces the risk of adulteration, contamination, and overdose.
• Protecting the human rights and dignity of drug users: Decriminalisation respects the autonomy and privacy of drug users and their choices. It also protects them from various forms of abuse, harassment, and discrimination by law enforcement agents, judicial authorities, health care providers, and society at large. It also enhances their right to health, education, work, and social participation.
• Enhancing the access to treatment and harm reduction services: Decriminalisation removes barriers for drug users to seek help for their addiction or related problems. It also encourages or facilitates the provision of evidence-based interventions that can reduce the harms of drug use, such as opioid substitution therapy, needle and syringe exchange programs, supervised consumption facilities, or overdose prevention kits.1

Drug addiction is a public health issue, not a crime. It should be treated with compassion and evidence, not with stigma and punishment. Decriminalisation is a more humane and effective way to address it than prohibition. It can improve the health and well-being of drug users, their families, and their communities. It can also save lives, money, and resources. It is time to end the war on drugs and start a new era of drug policy reform

Please do checkout my Substack — https://jordlaidler.substack.com/