Republicans will Never have a Spokesman as Trustworthy, Intelligent and Articulate as Obama

Jordan Arizmendi
PoliticalHaze
Published in
6 min readNov 10, 2018

--

About a week ago, Obama gave a great speech, just before the mid-term election. The purpose of the speech was to inspire democrats to get out and vote. Judging by the election results, Obama was successful. They both gave their speeches at the same time — one channel had Obama’s remarkable wisdom and diction, and another channel had the giant Oompa Loompa repeating everything he said (he always does that to make his speeches longer).

Watching the two speeches was like night and day. The differences were laughable. Obama was so articulate and eloquent, whereas Trump could hardly compose a single sentence.

Obama will be a secret weapon for the democratic party for decades. Everywhere he goes, crowds of people will follow. Every single word of advice he utters will be followed, because America knows he only wants the best for me, you and the country.

Republicans don’t really have any such spokesman. George Bush Jr.? Marco Rubio? Lindsay Graham? I wouldn’t buy a used car from these republicans, let alone take their political advice.

Republicans can say how much they admire and respect those figures, but in the end, they know that those republican icons don’t have Americas best interest at heart. After all, republicans proudly wave the flag of capitalism. They say, that it is American to be wealthy and to just care about yourself. Like Trump, all republicans just care about their own wallets. Remember when Hillary accused Trump of cheating on his taxes during the debates. Trump responds, “That makes me smart.” CNN

Isn’t it sad, that almost half of Americans voted for a guy who cheated on his taxes? He claimed to be smart for not contributing to your kid’s school or your parent’s hospital? Disgusting!

Fox News wrote a scathing article about the speech Obama gave just before the elections. The jealousy was so apparent, I had to wipe it from my computer screen.

After analyzing parts of Obama’s speech, the article asks,

Is President Trump really that divisive? Or are his liberal antagonists who are pushing that narrative incapable of perceiving a conservative message as anything other than divisive?

The liberal media paint Trump as the most divisive president in history in their comprehensive daily smears of every action he takes and every statement he makes. It makes no difference that he’s often just responding to their daily invective because, by definition, they can’t be divisive. They’re just presenting the facts — or so they tell us.

They point to President Trump’s tweets and his condemnation of “fake news” — but what really agitates the liberal media is that this president has the audacity to hit back, even though they’ve drawn first blood. They’re not used to being served their own medicine.

To liberals, divisiveness means a refusal to acquiesce to their leftist policy demands. They never consider their own dogmatic, uncompromising agenda to be divisive.

President Obama talks a good game now, but don’t forget that in office he regarded his own ideas as sacrosanct and was incredulous that anyone could possibly oppose him in good faith. He considered his policies to be self-evidently superior, so told us that Republicans opposed him solely out of crass partisanship.

Fox News is opinion news. Therefore, you can’t really consider Fox anything else. Opinion news has a giant advantage over other more reliable news sources. Being opinion, Fox could stretch the truth a bit, and its readers won’t mind.

There are SO many things wrong with the excerpt above, but if you are a die hard Trumpkin, and you read that, your beliefs would only be validated. First of all, the article claims that LIBERALS condemn Trump’s tweets as “fake news”. Trump is the only one squealing about fake news. He does it at least once during every speech he gives. Though, to this day, he has never pinpointed a single article that is “fake”. If he did that, he would be subjected to a defamation lawsuit. He could call CNN “fake news” all he wants, but claiming a journalist is writing “fake news” could get him in trouble. Except of course, if the journalist was really writing lies about Trump. In that case, Trump could sue the journalist and the network. But he never has.

Also the article actually questions that Trump is divisive. Isn’t that how he gained the republican nomination? By making all of those dim witted republicans fear the Muslim and hate the Hispanic? Trump got elected by promising to kick out Hispanics from the country so that unemployed republicans could get their jobs back. Trump railed that their jobs were stolen by illegal aliens, because their salaries are a lot cheaper.

If only these morons would have changed the channel from Fox, they would have discovered that Trump only hires foreigners, because “their salaries are a lot cheaper.” Hence, Trump would never completely eliminate foreign labor from our markets, because that would affect his bottom line.

Trump is the most divisive politician America has ever seen. Why else do you think Trump started up that news about some caravan approaching the border filled with Mexicans and terrorists? Whatever happened to that anyway? I never heard anything. Did it manage to sneak into the country undetected, or was it just another lie Trump was trumpeting to scare us into voting republican?

Just like Adolf Hitler, Trump is nothing without fear. Hitler rose to fame in the exact same manner. He convinced the Germans that the Jews were stealing their jobs. It is so easy to compel hatred.

I’ll never forget during the election, Hillary was considered the most qualified candidate to ever run and Trump was considered the least qualified. At such a disadvantage, Trump had to play dirty. He couldn’t beat Hillary with his good ideas an political judgment. His only way to beat her was through hatred.

How many people reading this article hate Hillary or at least don’t like her? This woman devoted her legal career to helping impoverished women and children. Her foundation was considered the most effective charity in the world. It even got better ratings than Red Cross. If you do have even a drop of anger for this great woman, Trump got you.

Liberals don’t want to spread divisiveness. In fact, a divisive nation will not vote democratic. Democrats want the country to be in unity. Obamacare only works if all of America is in it together. Public education only works if America is in it together. As I write this, Trump’s Secretary of Education Betsy Devos is destroying public education.

Still, anyone who reads that Fox piece will think that democrats are divisive. Despite Trump’s calls against Muslims and Hispanics, Fox wants you to think that democrats and Obama are trying to spread hatred in America.

--

--