Improving Constituent Engagement

Marci Harris
Jun 9, 2019 · 11 min read

POPVOX CEO Marci Harris Testimony to the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress | June 5, 2019

Check one off the bucket list! Last week I got a chance to sit on the other side of the dais and testify in Congress, along with Brad Fitch of the Congressional Management Foundation and Professor Michael Neblo of THE Ohio State University.

It was an honor to speak on “improving constituent engagement” — especially given that lawmakers’ questions were so good. Video below and transcript here.

As these things go, that red light appeared long before I got through my prepared remarks (it was so much shorter when I practiced.) Below are the full prepared remarks along with some suggestions for the Select Committee. I welcome your thoughts and feedback!

Prepared remarks

Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you. I am honored to be working with the American Political Science Association’s Task Force on Congressional Reform’s Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation to produce recommendations for this committee.

I am a proud former Congressional staffer who loves this institution.

I am also the co-founder and CEO of POPVOX, a technology platform with a mission to “inform and empower individuals and make government work better for everyone.”

I came to DC from my home state of Tennessee to pursue an LL.M. in 2006 and interned with the Ways and Means Health subcommittee — eventually becoming counsel in the chairman’s personal office and covering tax, trade, and health. Those were the Affordable Care Act days and the amount of incoming constituent and advocacy input was unprecedented for the time. Going from taking notes on a laptop and digitally searching cases to the paper-based system of Congress was like stepping back in time.

I kept a list of the things I thought could be fixed with better technology — and the list kept growing. I imagined a system that could bring some structure to the legislative advocacy ecosystem — listing all bills online; organizations and constituents would create accounts and post input in a structured, transparent way with outward anonymity but real names and addresses sent with messages to lawmakers in a way that could be easily processed by offices.

I actually thought that this was something Congress could build for itself. I found, however, that unlike the Architect of the Capitol that takes care of the physical infrastructure of Congress — there was no entity that handled the digital infrastructure for Congress in a bicameral, nonpartisan way. To my knowledge, that is still the case. Instead I found my way to a group of Hill “Web Geeks” that got together regularly to dream and argue about how Congress could use tech better. Many of the advances of recent years — both inside and off The Hill — have their origins in this bipartisan “Get Stuff Done” caucus and similar ad hoc groups of staffers and supporters imagining how to do things better and working on their little piece of the puzzle.

I left the Hill in 2010 to form POPVOX (named for “vox populi,” the “voice of the people”) with co-founders Rachna Choudhry and Dr. Joshua Tauberer. We created the system that I had envisioned — delivering millions of messages over the years from constituents in every Congressional district and cataloging position statements from thousands of organizations. Of course, the fact that you are holding this hearing is evidence that our solution was not a panacea. Our POPVOX team solved one technical problem and found many others that needed attention.

I am happy to share with you how we are working on a new way to help lawmakers and constituents connect. But first, I want to offer three framing observations:

1. Individuals are engaging at scale and that is not going to stop.

2. Disinformation is proliferating and Congress has a role to play in countering it

Unfortunately, inadequate technology means that this vast pipeline of information flowing between constituents and Congress is undervalued by participants on both sides. Unsatisfactory interactions don’t just hurt the lawmaker’s standing with constituents, they can adversely impact Americans’ “political efficacy” — the sense that “people like me” can influence government — which political scientists have long noted is correlated to trust, community engagement, voting, and civic participation.

3. Technology created the problem and is the key to addressing it

It is not enough for this committee to examine ways to fix the technical systems of today — though, believe me, I have plenty of thoughts on that — but it must look further down the road and ask how communications between constituents and lawmakers should work in the 21st Century.

Imagine a 21st Century Congress

Imagine a Congressional office process in which constituents can easily request and receive more information or the lawmaker’s position on a topic. A “just the facts” CRS one-pager — along with the lawmaker’s most recent statement on the topic — is immediately dispatched. Constituent can follow up with additional comments or questions, which either receive an automatic reply if previously addressed or are passed along to the appropriate staffer for more consideration. Casework is managed, tracked, and digitally submitted to relevant agencies. Everyone in the office — including the member — can view interactions in real-time as they are aggregated and displayed in clear analytics.

Imagine a system in which organization position letters include a notation of how many constituents in the district consider themselves “members” of the organization — and these constituents receive a clear notification of position statements that have been submitted in their name, with an opportunity to comment or clarify. Imagine a platform in which committees could engage with stakeholders from around the country, allowing broader diversity and transparency in the early stages of bill drafting.

At POPVOX, we are building what we hope will be the first steps to this “21st Century Congress.” Through a grant from the Democracy Fund, the new POPVOX LegiDash provides basic information for staffers — a calendar, directory, and legislation tracker — but also introduces new ways to engage with constituents:

  • Allowing lawmakers to post their positions on pending bills (“support,” “oppose,” or “not yet stated”) which is displayed on the POPVOX bill page and sent via notification to constituents and followers.
  • Allowing lawmakers to post updates that anyone can follow and view but to which only constituents can reply. There is no algorithmic manipulation, so we are not deciding who sees what. We don’t sell ads or user data, so there is no incentive for us to try to drive clicks or eyeballs. It’s just a new way to distribute input to constituents and ask for input on specific topics.
  • We are also testing stakeholder engagement tools for committees.

As with our first version of POPVOX and subsequent iterations, we know this is not a panacea. We will build, and test, and incorporate what we learn — from lawmakers, staffers, stakeholders, researchers, and constituents — back into the platform. Our “optimization” goals are to increase the political efficacy among participants and improve the flow and quality of information for Congress. We are honored to work with this committee and your colleagues to do just that.

Thank you again.

I have a list of recommendations on a few of these points that I will submit in writing for the record.

Constituent Engagement Recommendations

1. Use vendor approval process to incentivize improved constituent engagement technology

  • Provide annual information sessions and requests for information (RFIs) to create opportunities for new vendors
  • Clearly describe requirements, restrictions, and processes to encourage new entrants to engage
  • Designate a point of contact within relevant offices (i.e. Ethics, CAO, Franking) and create a process for early consultation

Establish “customer satisfaction” ratings system for technology vendors, including:

  • A yearly survey of Congressional offices regarding the level of service and technical performance of their constituent management system
  • A requirement that approved vendors maintain a minimal “customer satisfaction” rating to continue their “approved” status (with a probationary period for more frequent review to allow for improvement before approval is removed)
  • A central repository for reporting issues or problems so that patterns of insufficient services or software issues are recorded and viewable to other members when they are making purchasing decisions.

2. Task Congressional Research Service with providing nonpartisan fact sheets on key issues

  • CRS establishes page on its website listing available issue briefs
  • Includes a clear identifier for each topic and a standardized URL, allowing offices to easily incorporate issue briefs into their responses to constituent input
  • Staffers submit requests for new issue briefs to CRS through the web page as they begin to receive constituent inquiries on new topics, allowing CRS to prioritize new issue briefs based on staffer requests

3. Maintain a 21st Century “Frank”

4. Work with the executive branch on digital submission of casework

5. Leverage “CWC 2.0” for new tools Congress-wide analytics and

6. Increase opportunities for problem identification and new solutions with a staffer“reverse pitch” and institutional support for novel solutions

Turning these ideas into actual solutions, however, will require a next step of financial support and assistance getting the solution vetted and adopted within Congress. The Select Committee should explore rules changes that would allow for a Congressional “challenge” with financial awards or contracts to solutions that address significant needs or pain points. Promising solutions should receive assistance through the process of vetting and sharing with relevant offices.

Marci Harris is co-founder and CEO of POPVOX, an online platform for legislative information and civic engagement.


Nonpartisan Platform for Civic Engagement and Governing

Marci Harris

Written by

POPVOX CEO and co-founder. Entrepreneur, lawyer, recovering Congressional staffer. Former Harvard Ash and New America California fellow.



Nonpartisan Platform for Civic Engagement and Governing

Marci Harris

Written by

POPVOX CEO and co-founder. Entrepreneur, lawyer, recovering Congressional staffer. Former Harvard Ash and New America California fellow.



Nonpartisan Platform for Civic Engagement and Governing

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store