The ‘New Vision’ Is Not so New: Let’s Act on It

We don’t have to start from scratch. But we do have to start.

By Janet Newbury

Danielle MacInnes via Unsplash

David Suzuki recently asserted that we have failed “to imagine a better way” than our current economic paradigm. He criticized all candidates in the upcoming federal Canadian election for making economic promises that continue to rely on growth. And he cited numerous reasons for calling this approach into question: income inequality, quality of life disparities, climate change, threats to democracy, and fleeting happiness.

I believe he makes a strong and important argument. And I agree: one of my biggest disappointments in the current campaign period is the steadfast commitment to a broken system by all parties. Rhetoric about ‘sustainable growth’ is simply that. We know what sustainability requires of us, and it means overcoming our addiction to the production-consumption cycle upon which growth relies. This is not to say that we don’t all need fair wages and enough money to live well. But a growth model economy — as we’ve seen this year in Canada — requires endless growth in order to be deemed healthy. This is a serious problem.

We have to start identifying ourselves as citizens, not consumers. Suzuki presents a compelling case that illustrates how doing so does not have to lead to hardship; it will actually enrich our lives and our societies in meaningful and measurable ways.

We know what sustainability requires of us, and it means overcoming our addiction to the production-consumption cycle upon which growth relies.

However, by inviting us to imagine something different, I think he presents a scenario in which we have more work cut out for ourselves than is actually the case.

People all over the world have been doing this work for a long time now. Let us not forget that despite being actively suppressed, Indigenous teachings persist thanks to the strength and sacrifice of generations. As Suzuki suggests with his reference to steady state economics and de-growth, there are also already working theories, and economic models. There is a vast body of evidence to support the notion that different economic models can (and do) contribute to greater equity and wellbeing that is sustainable. There are even precedents for actions and policies based on these ideas that can help guide us. Small scale though some of them are, they exist!

I do not believe the primary challenge ahead of us is to imagine possible alternatives to this system that enslaves so many. What we must do now is in fact take the leap, make some commitments, and join the flow of what is already under way and has been for some time. So we don’t have to start from scratch. But maybe the reality feels even scarier: We actually have to start.

As with many significant social justice movements throughout history, this exciting flow of ideas and actions is unfortunately not often part of mainstream conversations — as Suzuki rightly points out about the federal candidate debates about our economy. Indeed, this is perhaps why the media response to the Leap Manifesto is what it is (at the moment, anyway). But if the rich foundation upon which the manifesto has been built was more widely understood and appreciated, then perhaps committing to it would not feel like such a stretch to so many.

We don’t have to start from scratch. But maybe the reality feels even scarier: We actually have to start.

Recognizing the context that surrounds and the history that supports ideas like Suzuki’s or the Leap Manifesto (as examples), we might all become less cautious about considering alternatives to our dismal status quo as plausible — not just as ideas, but actions. Indeed, we would perhaps be more likely to see the implausibility of maintaining our current course of action.

How might we contribute to this re-contextualizing of seemingly radical ideas? I think there are endless possibilities and for each of us they will differ. However, here are a few strategies to consider:

My hunch is that if we honour those whose work precedes ours and celebrate the successes (big and small) of those who are taking real steps towards what Boyle and Klein refer to as a moral economy, we will find that we are not alone. Heck, maybe our leaders will even join us once they realize others have already taken the first steps.

These (and many other) resources might interest you:

  1. Cities for People
  2. Soul of the Community
  3. How to Create Good Jobs in BC
  4. The Body Economic: Why Prosperity Kills
  5. Counting on Marilyn Waring: New Advances in Feminist Economics
  6. Shareable and The Sharing Solution
  7. The BC Cooperative Association
  8. The Community Economies Collective
  9. The Post Growth Alliance
  10. Groundswell Community

Image credit: Jasper Lake and Mountains, Canada. From Public Domain Images, Creative Commons.

This article was originally published on Policy Note in 2015 republished on the Post Growth Institute (PGI) blog. Find out more about the PGI here.

Post Growth

Guiding the way to a full circle, #postgrowth economy…

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store