How will blockchain revolutionise Business Process Management?

Roop Singh
Sep 19, 2018 · 13 min read

Roop Singh & Ian Hawkins

This article first appeared on The PEX Network Annual Report — The Global State of Process Excellence & Transformation 2018

If you’ve ever read Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations (1776), you’ll know that Business Process Management is older than the United States of America:

So, for all the BPM software that we throw at our organizations today, have things really changed over 200 years? Adam Smith identified the division of labour and then their combinations of their different operations — as the number one way of exponentially increasing the output of a factory; and we know that whether we’re building a car or making cupcakes for a summer party, an extra pair of hands, properly deployed, can increase our output — not by halving our labour, but by making our labour more productive. Isn’t that what BPM, at heart, does? Small businesses often start out with a team of multitaskers, but a business doesn’t have to grow so large that the CVs of the payroll clerk and the head of sales look very different. You certainly wouldn’t expect them to cover for each other, except in the most dire of circumstances. This led to a division of labour, evolving into often siloed or department-oriented approach, rather than a process-oriented approach. BPM as a discipline has long sought to reach this goal of process efficiency and effectiveness.

Robotic Process Automation is a recent branch of the evolutionary tree: as we might divide labour so that people do the tasks best suited to them as individuals, we are beginning to assign tasks to computers that had previously been done by humans — and finding that the robot helpers are making very light work of many of the key processes are liable to be repetitive and prone to error when done by humans. Automation frees up humans to perform more complex activities. Where BPM is a functional discipline, RPA is a technology implementation advancement.

The objective of BPM, whether you work it out on a smart piece of bespoke computer software or shuffle pieces of card around on the boardroom table, hasn’t changed that much: it’s essentially about gaining process efficiency and effectiveness.

How companies can apply these methods, techniques and principles remains varied and hence determinant of their success.

As such, Adam Smith might quickly find himself at home with some of the concepts of BPM, and potentially even the more user-friendly products on the market (not to mention intrigued by the possibilities of our portable touch-screen analytical engines).

And then there came along blockchain.

Blockchain has been most conspicuous for the lottery-win type dividends that have made the headlines for 20-something investors in cryptocurrencies. But there is more to blockchain technology than making a few early adopters wealthy. What is the potential of blockchain beyond filing the pockets of the nouveau ultra-riche?

The word ‘blockchain’ is a shorthand for a particular type of distributed ledger technology. In a public permissionless blockchain like Bitcoin or Ethereum, every node of the network has visibility over the whole. Think of friends meeting for coffee:

Adam: I’ll get your coffee, Barbara, because you got mine last week.

Barbara: Thank you, Adam!

Clive: I’ve left my wallet at home… Adam, could you get mine as well?

Denise: Oh, same here! Sorry Adam!

Adam: Look, I’ll just buy everyone’s coffee…

Edward: I’ll tell you what, Adam — I still owe you $15 from last week. I’ll get these and we’re square, ok?

The waiter takes a single payment from Edward, and although nobody would call it ‘blockchain’, that’s exactly what it accomplishes: the participants of the network have kept track of all the transactions.

The difference is that a blockchain — with its blocks of transactions, lives on computers rather than in the memories of your friends who might remind you this is the third week in a row you’ve ‘left your wallet at home’ and maybe it’s time you got the drinks.

It’s the same with Bitcoin: there is no central bank issuing currency. By using the blockchain and military grade encryption to create Bitcoin, the digital currency solved the double-spending problem — i.e. not being allowed to spend the same digital money twice — without having to run it by a trusted central authority, just as you don’t need the bank’s seal of approval every time you hand over cash in a shop.

Blockchain’s implementation as Bitcoin — a peer-to-peer digital cash avatar — is an article in itself, yet it is not the only use of blockchain. Let’s focus on the non-monetary uses of blockchain for a moment. Here’s a simple example of how it can help protect intellectual property:

Let’s call the article you’re reading right now ‘Version A’. Now imagine that another publication decides to pad it out a bit with some more reporting and interviews for their journal, and publish what we’re going to call Version B. This is then translated into Spanish (Version C) and published overseas. Before we get too involved in different versions, we can see this whole transaction is starting to operate a bit like a blockchain: each iteration of the article is unchanged, and we can see how it is built on in subsequent iterations. In practical terms, what does this mean? If you have a journal of your own, wish to re-publish the article, and want to pay the people who wrote it, you know immediately where to send the money, depending on which version you’re going to publish:

Version A: the original authors

Version B: original authors, plus the editor

Version C: original authors, editor, and translator

Each version of the article does not change the previous version. This is immutability and is a core concept which we’ll come to later.

As we enter the world of blockchain — two key terms to introduce at this point are protocol and encryption.

Going back to our coffee shop friends, the transactions are following certain rules or protocols: they are all using the same currency, for example. We might say that other rules are that the amounts of money being discussed are quite small, and whatever other financial arrangements might be going on between the friends, what happens in the coffee shop, stays in the coffee shop.

All blockchains have some level of encryption: if our friends happen to be working out who pays what, in sign language, the information could be said to be encrypted (we assume the waiter doesn’t know sign language — unless he’s a hacker). We might also say this is a private permission-based blockchain as it only exists between the group of friends — a stranger couldn’t walk in and ask Edward to pay for her coffee too.

A blockchain, then, can be open to some, and restricted to others. There will be agreed upon rules or a protocol, to participate in the network and to access data.

So that’s what a blockchain is. Why would different companies need to use it for something like BPM?

Let’s imagine Adam Smith is at our shoulder and we are having to explain it to him. We’ll use his own process for pin making as a springboard. Here it is, highly simplified:

As Adam Smith noted, giving a separate task to each person makes the whole system exponentially more efficient. How may blockchain be applied to this?

Let’s imagine that we’re not just talking about five different individuals making the constituent parts of a pin, but five separate companies. Without every part of the system working together, there is no pin at the end, no product, and therefore, nobody getting paid. It helps if everyone works together.

Let’s imagine that the price of steel from which the wire is drawn fluctuates so much that it has a major impact on the profits of the manufacturers. This is a factor that can affect every company in the process, but only one company, the wire drawers, actually buys the raw material. On a day when steel is suddenly very cheap, the company drawing the wire is keen to buy as much as possible. Unfortunately, they don’t have much money in the bank.

This is where blockchain might help.

Traditionally, the wire-drawers might have to go to the bank and ask to borrow more money. With a blockchain based lending platform, they can borrow money — or even other services — from the other businesses further down the line on a peer-to-peer basis.

As companies agreed to record transactions on the blockchain apriori, every company can see what the others are doing — there can be no dispute that even though the steel in the tip-sharpeners’ warehouse was paid for with the head-fitters’ money, delivered by the top-grinders’ lorries and belongs to the wire-drawers.

We can immediately see that blockchain has enabled these five companies to work together for their mutual benefit. Compare the otherwise identical pin-makers in the next town along who aren’t on the same blockchain network and platform.

Our five businesses are working together to pool resources, including finance. Many small businesses find they are at the mercy of their banks when it comes to cash flow. Using a blockchain based network and platform, companies may loan each other funds with transparency. Could banks see value and join these networks as consortiums? Glad you asked, it’s already happening.

This sharing of data with encryption means that quality of data is consistent, proprietary information is protected, and thanks to multiple points of verification, fraud is discouraged.

There is a clear motive for each part to work together for greater prosperity, and while Bitcoin has got everyone excited about the money, the real commodities here are data and trust.

Blockchain is just a glorified database. What’s the big deal about it?’ That’s a common refrain from people who still like to view things from a computing paradigm that rightfully brought us to this stage of evolution.

Blockchain is a ‘shared encrypted ledger with a shared state’ meaning all the participants have the same data and the same point of time. This is unlike databases connected via systems, in which one has to reconcile the data often.

We now start to see why blockchain is preferable to a standard database.

Clearly, while a database can be changed posteriori, by the custodian of the database, the information on a blockchain is immutable. A database is a snapshot of a moment individually, while a blockchain is a snapshot of a moment in the data’s journey- shared by everyone. So, it tells you about the journey up to that moment.

A database may be untrustworthy; yet when two parties join up and share a common state of the data using secure manner, they have the makings of a blockchain.

Remember the three versions of this article (A — original; B — edited; C — translated)? A publisher reads Version C and thinks it is brilliant (it could happen). A database might say that this was written by the translator, rather than the original authors — and it would be a mistake to expect the translator to write another article on blockchain. Likewise, it would be a mistake to think that the original authors could translate an article into Spanish. Understanding who came on board the project at what stage of the process from authorship to editing and finally translation is useful data. If the publisher wants another article, a contributing editor, or a Spanish translator, an audit of the blockchain will point them to the right person more reliably. A blockchain based platform, can be used to establish intellectual property rights, credits and even associated royalties (using smart contracts, more on those some other time).

When does it make sense to use blockchain? Data and trust are the key concepts here, and you might find it useful to think back to the analogies given above as we discuss these ideas. Blockchain is really a system of formalising the movement of data and trust between parties.


Auditability : This allows us to go back in time and being able to audit and review those transactions.

So, when it’s needed to be certain that the transaction is authentic, has not be been and cannot not be tampered with, use of blockchain is highly effective. In this effect, it differs from the use of centralized owned and centralized stored databases.


Public blockchains bring with them an egalitarian perspective of a community of people setting up nodes, participating in the network for the benefit of the network. This leads to three experts in different fields contributing to a Wikipedia article, for instance, or a dozen different companies producing and then tracking components for a car.

Furthermore, distributing data storage over a network rather than storing it on a centralized database removes the single point of failure for data compromise. Recent headlines about data breaches at companies such as Equifax, Home Depot and Target have been damaging to those brands, and left each organization with the problems of cleaning up the mess. Imagine, if they had distributed their data and secured it on a blockchain, their hacks might not have been so impactful.

Wherever there is a need to secure data or to remove single point of failure, think: would encrypted storage using a blockchain be useful?


Proof of Ownership

Proof of Authorship



‘We, the participants, of the network, believe this to be the single shared state of all the transactions in the network.’

All of these finally lead us to Trust. Think about what happens when there’s absence of trust. Think about the time, effort and resources we spend on establishing the intangible sense of trust. We’re slowly, yet surely moving towards a new paradigm — ‘Trust merely not in a company or an organization, but trust in the chain.’ Trust in a trustless automated world. Trust underpins so much of what we value: collaboration, creativity, security. An absence of trust leads quickly to paranoia and paralysis. Blockchain, then, is truly an opportunity for entities of all flavours to be creative and collaborative, without the risk of losing data, intellectual property and digital assets.

Picture the inner workings of your company. Now bring into vision the urban sprawl of data, ERPs, home grown customized applications with a patchwork of interfaces, middleware and customer portals. Now extend this vision into systems across all of your partners throughout your supply chain. That’s the operational reality of today’s incumbent corporation. Now imagine a streamlined automated process with all your network partners, sharing the same state of the data. That could possibly be the reality of tomorrow’s corporation. As many transformational landscape changes, this one may not be a choice for some.



where the future is written

Sign up for Predict Newsletter

By Predict

Monthly updates on science and technology shaping our future. Take a look.

By signing up, you will create a Medium account if you don’t already have one. Review our Privacy Policy for more information about our privacy practices.

Check your inbox
Medium sent you an email at to complete your subscription.

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store