I hope we get better at not hiring False Positives. But False Positives is the only way we learn. We learn nothing from False Negatives. And there is a huge risk we miss out on a 20x employee. The way we get better at hiring is to hire, learn, and improve. Do not be afraid of hiring False Positives. Give people chances. Be afraid of missing the 20x employee.
How to Hire
Henry Ward
2.6K110

CC0 Wyncliffe

This is awesome. Reality trumps predictions. Like in Pretotyping . It’s no use to stay in Thoughtland and decide based on opinions (what the hiring process generally is). Much better to Pretotype, that is test in real life, whether a candidate is really a Positive or is really a Negative as determined by the hiring process.

What does a “pretotype hire” look like?

Maybe a one-off assignment to validate if the candidate is worth what we think (confirm the Positive) or is worth much more than we think (disprove the Negative). We might also learn that the candidate is not worth enough… shame, but now we know for sure rather than live in the doubt.

Or a trial period with the objective to learn if the candidate is a good match, rather than just to teach them the job as trial periods are currently treated.

How else can we learn fast whether a candidate is a good match for real?


Thank you for your post! This prompted me to write a post myself on Pretotyping hiring. Soon on Pretotype Matters in Medium.