NFTs: What Are They Worth?
Non-fungible tokens are selling for thousands or even millions of dollars — but assigning a dollar value to them is complex.
This story comes out of PubDAO, a decentralized news wire.
When my family and I showed our uncle a Bored Ape on NFT marketplace OpenSea, his initial reaction was confusion and shock. “How is that monkey worth $200,000?” he exclaimed.
He’s not alone; many people have expressed bafflement at the spectacle of NFT art selling for thousands, or even millions, of dollars. Without a clear understanding of what happens under the hood, it can leave them feeling perplexed about what really goes on in the NFT space.
So where does the value of an NFT come from? There are lots of variables that collectors consider, including ownership, identity, scarcity, aesthetics, community, technology, and utility.
Value of ownership
Firstly let’s consider how NFTs accrue value. Many of the variables that affect their value fall outside the realms of the art itself.
For the first time, NFTs are providing proof of ownership over digital assets through the use of the blockchain. Each NFT contract contains a token ID number, and following this, an address that belongs to the owner. In the web 2.0 world, ownership of digital assets such as artwork or music has historically been difficult to determine; for instance, someone could right-click and save an image and claim that they own it. And while the image exists as a download on their computer, is this really true ownership?
NFTs are a completely novel asset class. The tokens are cryptographically unique, and cannot be replicated or copied. They’re stored on a blockchain, a web of public ledgers that tracks both provenance and transactions. Because blockchains are a trustless, decentralized technology, there’s no requirement for psychological trust involved in any of the interactions or transactions; no one person owns or commands them. And because their records are public, anyone can find out who’s owned the NFT, its sales history, and when it was first minted. As a result, we can quite easily determine what is authentic, and what is fake, and thereby we can attribute value.
Another key property of NFTs is their metadata, which enables information to be inserted into the NFT, such as descriptions, images and names. These properties arguably form another factor by which value can be determined. Furthermore, it is not just images that fall under the umbrella of NFTs, a whole array of media forms such as GIFS, texts, videos, music, and games can all be minted and sold as NFTs.
So to recap, NFTs are stored on the blockchain, they have clearly defined owners, and they point to metadata files, which link to the creations themselves.
Essentially, you have the ability to purchase ownership of a digital asset and transfer it to other owners without the influence of centralized platforms or third parties. It’s this true ownership that forms the crucial differentiating factor for NFTs over existing forms of digital content, and enables them to accrue value.
Value of membership
But the value of NFTs lies in more than just their proof of provenance; community is just as important.
Community is intrinsic to human nature, something that every person yearns for, or is a part of in some form. Whether it be niche interests, hobbies or friendships, online or digital, we all have our own groups where we interact with like-minded individuals.
Many NFTs serve as membership tokens to a community. Anyone who can prove that they own a Bored Ape Yacht Club NFT, for example, is welcomed into a community where they can take part in a private Discord, receive invitations to social events, and network with other BAYC holders.
Evidently then, value arises from the micro-level rather than simply through the NFT’s artwork. Value can be created amongst a tight-knit group of even 100 collectors, and it is the community that sustains the value based on their commitment.
Value of identity
Just as with community, our identity is inherently important to our everyday life; how we present ourselves to the world is intertwined with status, whether it’s wearing an expensive watch, a band T-shirt or a mustache.
Similarly, we use NFTs to tell the digital world something about ourselves. Many collectors have begun to use NFTs as their digital identity; a Bored Ape or CryptoPunk becomes intertwined with how the owner sees themselves and represents themselves to others. It’s also an effective networking tool, verifying the holder as part of the NFT’s community. Twitter has lent weight to this view of NFTs, enabling users to use verified NFTs as their profile picture
And that digital identity has an associated value; one CryptoPunk holder turned down an offer of $9.5 million for his NFT, arguing that, “our online identities are just as strong — if not more powerful — than our real-life personas.”
Value of aesthetics
The value of NFTs is determined by the community; the market decides what they’re worth, based on factors including what their previous work sold for, their portfolio of previous work, how long they have been creating and who has collected their work. By comparing it to other art forms, we can make well-informed choices about whether the art is valuable or not.
Scarcity and rarity
For the first time, digital artwork can be linked with scarcity; that limited supply can add to the value of an NFT. Collectors find beauty in the number or size of a collection; for instance, 1/1s are seemingly more valuable than an NFT from a collection of 10,000, given that there will only ever be one of the NFT in existence.
Rare traits can also lend value to an NFT; the scarcer the rarity, the higher it will be valued. The most valuable CryptoPunks are the rare Alien and Ape punks, many of which have sold for multimillion-dollar sums. However, aesthetic preference can outweigh rarity; a number of relatively common traits have become sought-after in some NFT collections, suggesting that trends and the community play a role in determining value.
Influence and memes
Value can be arbitrary; something may suddenly gain value without any reason why. But more often than not, there’s something that acts as a catalyst, and it can be the result of an outside force. Take Crypto Skulls, a collection that chugged along unremarked since its creation in 2017 — until NFT influencer Gary Vee swept the floor, prompting a wave of hype. The NFT collection was thought to have had the same cultural significance as CryptoPunks and it skyrocketed in sales as the floor rose to over 4 ETH in a matter of 24 hours. It’s not just the art itself that determines value; it’s driven by individuals and influence.
“What’s happened in the past year or so, with meme stocks, meme cryptocurrencies, and NFTs, is that random people on the Internet don’t really care what the institutional establishment says is valuable,” early NFT investor Nick Tomaino told Decrypt. “If the collective group of people on the Internet believes something has value, it has value.”
Value of royalties
Unlike the web 2.0 world, where artists have to rely on copyright laws to establish ownership of their work, Web3 and NFTs ensure that the art is inherently their creation, and only when it transfers is the ownership changed.
For a long time, third-party platforms have acted as rent-seeking intermediaries in the art world, taking the lion’s share of profits from secondary market sales. NFTs enable artists to profit from both the initial sale of their work and the secondary market via automated royalties. This provides a steady revenue stream for artists, as well as the promise of rewards from sales made as they established themselves in the art world, should they subsequently become more famous and their early work rise in value.
Value of utility
To date, most of the conversation around the value of NFTs has focused on NFT artworks. But in recent months, NFTs with additional utility have come into increasing focus.
NFTs that have gained the most traction have increasingly been those that offer utility through airdrops, in real-life events that can only be accessed via the NFT, in access to the metaverse, governance through DAOs, or even opportunities to mint other projects.
It’s the culmination of the factors discussed in the article so far: ownership, membership, identity, rarity, scarcity, utility, and aesthetic. They make the NFT more meaningful and help to engrain sentiment and attachment, both of which make the NFT much harder to just flip for financial investment.
More sophisticated forms of utility are emerging with the intersection of DeFi and NFTs, with some collections offering the ability to stake NFTs in exchange for tokens — offering collectors the opportunity to make passive income.
As demands for more utility grow, artistic value alone is no longer enough to satisfy NFT collectors. Communities are expecting more from NFT creators than a prototypical roadmap, irrespective of whether they’re just an artist.
The problem is, sometimes these expectations aren’t realistic; the greatest NFT collections have succeeded based on new, exciting and unique ideas. Once they’ve been done, it’s difficult for derivatives to sustain the same model over a long period of time, as the novel becomes repetitive and familiar.
Given the speed and high stakes on the table, it’s difficult to judge what the space will look like in a year’s time. At the time of writing, gamification and tokenomics are two of the most sought-after utilities that a project can develop and provide for its community — but this could yet change.