Anyone can publish on Medium per our Policies, but we don’t fact-check every story. For more info about the coronavirus, see cdc.gov.

Innovation Science: There’s a method to that light bulb going off in your head

Image for post
Image for post

That’s especially true right now. Innovation holds the key to the battle against COVID-19 through our ability to come up with remedies across fields like science, statistics, engineering, manufacturing, and social policy to counter the pandemic that has swept across the world.

But innovation is hard. For routine product launches in the corporate sector, a recent peer-reviewed study indicates that as few as 35 percent of innovations succeed. When the innovation efforts are bolder, the statistics become even more dire — venture capitalists, regarded as experts in their fields, are rarely successful more than 1 in 4 times. And the odds of translating an idea into a billion-dollar business? One in 20,000!

However, these statistics do not take into account emerging evidence that there’s a method to the madness — deep patterns to innovation, now coming to light as our understanding of innovation shifts along a spectrum from serendipity to science. Innovation is now being seen as not only originality and creativity in thinking but also as a discipline, with identifiable patterns, in which a practitioner can learn to recognize and routinely employ best practices that increase the likelihood of achieving a high-impact outcome.

Innovation has been a scholarly pursuit for more than 100 years, with significant work carried out to understand various patterns. Engineering has made strides in comprehending technology development and process innovation. The pure and applied sciences have provided an understanding of processes of discovery and scientific revolution, and, of course, realized innovations in their own right. Management scientists have developed many innovation models, such as the notions of incremental and radical, disruptive and sustaining, competence enhancing and competence destroying, and enabling and progressive innovation.

Yet more needs to be done to deconstruct the act of innovating. While some people will display extraordinary ability to innovate, many aspects of innovative thought and action can be observed and taught. This can build the base skills of the broader population and enhance the capabilities of organizations — many of which, from national and state governments to the private sector, have leaders who focus on innovation, with titles including Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, or Chief Innovation Officer.

At Purdue, we are taking on this challenge by investigating and developing the research-derived foundations of Innovation Science to foster a community of collaborating scholars and practitioners, both within and outside the academy. Our vision is to bring order to the innovation space, and integrate related insights across disciplines through research that is anchored, at least initially, in the linkage between innovation and impact-oriented design.

The design process dovetails with innovation in the way it provides a logical bridge from problem identification and framing to solution and impact. Using design as a foundation, we are framing the study of innovation as the exploration of a generalizable approach to problem solving that can be broadly employed regardless of domain — much like the scientific method.

Innovation Science, built around design, embraces insights from such fields of inquiry as strategy, economics, entrepreneurship, systems-of-systems, design, policy, anthropology, sociology, complexity, education, engineering education, engineering, technology and technology history. The value of these cross-field connections is well-recognized and is captured in the concept of convergence put forward by the National Science Foundation.

Design has classically been expressed as a goal-oriented activity that progresses from identifying a problem to developing and deploying a solution. But work on high-impact design has revealed that achieving non-incremental outcomes — to lead through innovation — may require design that more holistically () explores linkages between problem and solution, and exploits multifaceted perspectives of a functional, social and emotional nature.

Building these perspectives through Innovation Science can facilitate the convergence that addresses complex, multidiscipline problems. This can establish a problem-solving language that lets different disciplines interact and more effectively engage, and offers a way to characterize different classes of problems and the methods and solutions that achieve impact.

The study of high-impact design has illustrated that each stage of the design activity is associated with specific actions that can help an innovator depart from the norm, with impact as an end goal. These behaviors draw upon insights gleaned from multiple fields — a scaffold upon which to connect perspectives from diverse schools of thought during the innovation process and foster improved outcomes by enhancing the innovator’s intent and practices.

Innovation Science could bridge the gap between discovery and application and be a valuable contributor to society. A repeatable, scalable, teachable understanding of innovation is a catalyst of insight, a source of leadership, and an engine of growth — in short, a driver of impact.

Those who lead in Innovation Science will likely lead the world.

Image for post
Image for post

Related Links:

Innovation Science: An Emerging Field

Finding a Lower-Risk Path to High-Impact Innovations

The Discipline of Creativity

Thinking Big to Address Major Challenges: Design and Problem-Solving Patterns for High-Impact Innovation

Scaling Impact: Equity, Access, and Opportunity in Boston’s Regional Food Economy

How CFOs Can Take the Long-Term View in a Short-Term Economy

A New Go-to-Market Model for the Industrial Internet

Purdue Engineering Initiative in Innovation and Making

Purdue Engineering

Pioneering groundbreaking technology, unlocking…

Purdue College of Engineering

Written by

Known as the “Cradle of Astronauts,” with a long list of pioneers includes Neil Armstrong and Amelia Earhart. Ranked Top 10 nationwide by USNWR.

Purdue Engineering

Pioneering groundbreaking technology, unlocking revolutionary ideas and advancing humankind across the country, planet and universe. Explore how leading educators, thinkers and innovators at the Purdue University College of Engineering are shaping the future — and beyond.

Purdue College of Engineering

Written by

Known as the “Cradle of Astronauts,” with a long list of pioneers includes Neil Armstrong and Amelia Earhart. Ranked Top 10 nationwide by USNWR.

Purdue Engineering

Pioneering groundbreaking technology, unlocking revolutionary ideas and advancing humankind across the country, planet and universe. Explore how leading educators, thinkers and innovators at the Purdue University College of Engineering are shaping the future — and beyond.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch

Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore

Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store