Null Hypothesis vs. Alternate Hypothesis: The Foundation of Statistical Inference

Sarowar Ahmed
Python’s Gurus
Published in
4 min readJul 21, 2024
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Introduction

In statistical hypothesis testing, two fundamental hypotheses are proposed: the null hypothesis (H₀​) and the alternative hypothesis (Hₐ​). Understanding these concepts is crucial for making data-driven decisions. This article will delve into the definitions, differences, and implications of these hypotheses, as well as their relationships with p-values, test statistics, and critical values. We will also provide a mathematical example, using confidence intervals to demonstrate these concepts with Python code.

An In-depth Analysis

In statistical hypothesis testing, we start with two competing claims about a population parameter: the null hypothesis (H₀) and the alternate hypothesis (H₁ or Hₐ)

  1. Null Hypothesis (H₀): The null hypothesis is typically a statement of no effect, no difference, or no relationship. It represents the status quo or the currently accepted belief about a population parameter.
  2. Alternate Hypothesis (H₁ or Hₐ): The alternate hypothesis is a statement that contradicts the null hypothesis. It represents the research hypothesis or the claim we want to provide evidence for.

The goal of hypothesis testing is to determine whether there is enough statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternate hypothesis.

Key Concepts in Hypothesis Testing

  1. Test Statistic: A test statistic is a numerical summary of the data that is used to make a decision about the null hypothesis. Common test statistics include t, z, F, and chi-square.
  2. p-value: The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed value under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
  3. Significance Level (α): The significance level is a pre-determined threshold used to make decisions about the null hypothesis. Common values are 0.05 and 0.01.
  4. Critical Value: The critical value is the boundary point in the distribution of the test statistic that corresponds to the significance level. It separates the region where we reject the null hypothesis from the region where we fail to reject it.

Relationship Between p-value, Test Statistic, and Critical Value

The relationship between these concepts determines whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis:

  1. If p-value ≤ α, we reject H₀. If p-value > α, we fail to reject H₀.
  2. For a two-tailed test: If |Test Statistic| > Critical Value, we reject H₀. If |Test Statistic| ≤ Critical Value, we fail to reject H₀.

Changes in Variables Affecting Hypothesis Testing

  1. Sample Size: Increasing the sample size generally leads to a smaller p-value and a higher likelihood of rejecting H₀, as it increases the power of the test.
  2. Effect Size: A larger effect size (difference between the sample statistic and the hypothesized population parameter) typically results in a smaller p-value and a higher chance of rejecting H₀.
  3. Significance Level: Increasing α makes it easier to reject H₀, but also increases the risk of Type I errors (falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis).
  4. Variance: Higher variance in the data generally leads to larger p-values and a lower likelihood of rejecting H₀.

Real-World Example with Confidence Intervals

Let’s consider a real-world problem involving a company that produces light bulbs. The company claims that their light bulbs last an average of 1000 hours. A researcher wants to test this claim and determine a confidence interval for the true mean lifespan.

Problem: A random sample of 50 light bulbs is tested, resulting in a mean lifespan of 980 hours with a standard deviation of 100 hours. Test the company’s claim at a 5% significance level and construct a 95% confidence interval for the true mean lifespan.

Solution

Step 1: Define hypotheses H₀: μ = 1000 hours H₁: μ ≠ 1000 hours

Step 2: Calculate the test statistic (t) t = (x̄ — μ₀) / (s / √n) Where: x̄ = sample mean (980) μ₀ = hypothesized population mean (1000) s = sample standard deviation (100) n = sample size (50)

Step 3: Calculate p-value and make a decision We’ll use Python to perform the calculations and test:

import scipy.stats as stats
import numpy as np

# Sample statistics
sample_mean = 980
sample_std = 100
sample_size = 50
hypothesized_mean = 1000

# Calculate t-statistic
t_stat = (sample_mean - hypothesized_mean) / (sample_std / np.sqrt(sample_size))

# Calculate p-value (two-tailed test)
p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.t.cdf(abs(t_stat), df=sample_size-1))

# Print results
print(f"t-statistic: {t_stat:.4f}")
print(f"p-value: {p_value:.4f}")

# Compare p-value to significance level
alpha = 0.05
if p_value <= alpha:
print("Reject the null hypothesis")
else:
print("Fail to reject the null hypothesis")

# Calculate 95% confidence interval
margin_of_error = stats.t.ppf(0.975, df=sample_size-1) * (sample_std / np.sqrt(sample_size))
ci_lower = sample_mean - margin_of_error
ci_upper = sample_mean + margin_of_error

print(f"95% Confidence Interval: ({ci_lower:.2f}, {ci_upper:.2f})")
t-statistic: -1.4142
p-value: 0.1637
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
95% Confidence Interval: (952.12, 1007.88)

Interpretation

  1. The t-statistic is -1.4142, and the p-value is 0.1637.
  2. Since the p-value (0.1637) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
  3. We don’t have sufficient evidence to conclude that the true mean lifespan of the light bulbs is different from 1000 hours.
  4. The 95% confidence interval is (952.12, 1007.88) hours. We can be 95% confident that the true population mean lifespan falls within this interval.

Conclusion

Based on our sample data, we don’t have enough evidence to contradict the company’s claim that their light bulbs last an average of 1000 hours. The 95% confidence interval includes the claimed mean of 1000 hours, further supporting this conclusion. However, it’s worth noting that the interval is quite wide, suggesting that more precise estimates could be obtained with a larger sample size.

This example demonstrates the application of hypothesis testing and confidence intervals in a real-world scenario, illustrating how statistical inference can be used to make decisions and provide estimates in practical situations.

If you enjoyed this article, feel free to follow me for more insights and updates.
LinkedIn GitHub Twitter

--

--

Sarowar Ahmed
Python’s Gurus

An IIT Madras Scholar | LinkedIn Top Statistics Voice | Researching on Quantitative Finance | Data Science | AI | Machine Learning | Deep Learning |