When moral realism and Darwinism conflict, which one must go?

Two philosophers agree that moral realism and Darwinism are incompatible. One says that means moral realism must go, the other says, no, it’s Darwinism that must go.

Is there such a thing as moral realism — the idea that morality or ethical propositions are an objective feature of our world? Most philosophers say yes. In a 2009 survey of 3,226 respondents

--

--

Medium’s center for scientifically-informed content.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Gerald R. Baron

Husband, father, grandfather, mostly-retired, farm advocate, author, communicator. Deeply curious about science, nature, spirit and history.