Member-only story

Modern Sexual Options Described as Ice Cream Flavors

And why social constraints around sexual identity exist in the first place.

Kaia Maeve
Sexography
7 min readDec 22, 2020

--

Let’s say that vanilla is opposite gender attraction and chocolate is same gender attraction. Heterosexuals love vanilla. Homosexuals love chocolate. Bisexuals love both. Pansexuals don’t just love vanilla and chocolate, they’re into all the flavors. And asexuals prefer slushies. Reddit

Why do we define sex as an identity?

And as long as we are talking about sexual relations between consenting adults, why are there limits on what kinds of sex are considered ok and what kinds aren’t?

Isn’t sex something we do throughout our lifetimes? Not an indelible identity?

This is where we could all use a lesson from the horny, drunk, and often naked Ancient Greeks. Although same-sex relations were common among Ancient Greeks, they didn’t have a word for homosexuality. They viewed sex as an act, rather than an identity. People had sex because it was something they wanted to do — it didn’t define them. It didn’t limit them. Grace Ryan

The French philosopher Foucault wrote that legislating sex, sexual identity, and the definition of sexual archetypes was actually done as a method of social…

--

--

Sexography
Sexography

Published in Sexography

Conversations about sex from all around the world

Kaia Maeve
Kaia Maeve

Written by Kaia Maeve

Queen Bee of the #TechHippies. Divinely inspired. Dogma-avoidant. Peace Love Technology. #WebMakersCircle #Onelove

Responses (7)