Being, non-Being, and Not Being

A fine line, yet a world of difference

æ | Ed Alvarado
Sonderbodhi

--

If you’ve read the other articles about the world, black vs white mentality, and grey neutrality, you have probably seen the amateur diagrams used to explain some complex ideas. However I must admit that the diagram for this one is a lot harder to grasp conceptually. This is especially because regardless of the diagram, there can be so many ways to elaborate on the distinction between being, non-being, and not being. So before throwing out any diagrams, let me try to explain things linguistically.

A Mexican, a German, and a non-German walk into a bar…

The core of the issue here is: how many people are we talking about?
When you read that, you probably intuitively interpreted it as 3 people. However….

  • It could be a Mexican, a German and e.g. an American (3 people)
  • It could simply be a German and a non-German Mexican (2 people)
  • Or what if the non-German is actually not even a person at all, and the person walking in is a Mexican-German? (1 person)

The core problem here is the distinction between being, not being, and non-being. Drawing a fundamental difference between not-being and non-being might seem trivial or picky, but it is a fine line that makes a world of difference, as the following section will prove.

Racist, not racist, anti-racist

--

--

æ | Ed Alvarado
Sonderbodhi

🌎 Citizen 📝 Citizenship, Diplomacy, & International Relations/Law 🤓Philosophy, Logic and Psychology