John Couch Adams was best known, in the astronomical world, as the man who tried-and-failed to discover Neptune, getting scooped by Galle and Le Verrier in 1846. But his failure to discover Neptune in no way inhibited his future success, and his ultimate legacy as a scientist. (PUBLIC DOMAIN)

In Science, And In Life, ‘Once A Failure’ Does Not Mean ‘Always A Failure’

The story of John Couch Adams, “the man who failed to discover Neptune,” and his cosmic redemption.


Perhaps its human nature to want to only think positive thoughts about our heroes. We don’t want our sports heroes to cheat or use performance-enhancing drugs. We don’t want our humanitarian or political heroes to be involved with sordid scandals or criminal activity. And we don’t want our scientific heroes to commit the greatest of all scientific sins: the sin of having been wrong.

But science is not an endeavor one undertakes all by themselves, but rather as part of a worldwide community. And being wrong is not a death sentence, but rather is often a stepping-stone to an even greater success. “Once a failure, always a failure” couldn’t be further from the truth. While it’s true that even our greatest scientific heroes had their flaws, some of history’s greatest failures were followed by a success that no one could have predicted.

This is the redemption story of John Couch Adams, possibly the greatest astronomer to colossally fail.

A young John Couch Adams, who began his career smitten with the theory of the existence of a new planet beyond Uranus. (SAMUEL COUSINS OF A PAINTING BY THOMAS MOGFORD)

By the mid-1800s, Newton’s law of universal gravitation had stood unchallenged for nearly 200 years. It successfully predicted both the terrestrial motions of objects on Earth and the celestial motions of the planets, moons, comets and asteroids. In 1781, for the first time in history, we were given a new chance to test this law for the planets, as William Herschel discovered the first planet that wasn’t known for thousands of years: Uranus.

For every planet, Newton’s theory predicts it should move in an ellipse around the Sun, and Uranus absolutely did. But Newton also predicted how quickly a planet should move throughout its orbit, and his theory of gravitation gave us Kepler’s second law:

  • The area swept out by each planet as it orbited the Sun was the same in any given time interval at all points along the orbit.

After decades of observations, it was clear that Uranus didn’t do that.

While its color had been visible for a long time, it was only with the Voyager 2 mission that we visited this world, discovered in 1781, up close. It’s now been some 30 years since we’ve been there, and have yet to go back. (NASA / VOYAGER 2)

The known inner and outer worlds all obeyed these laws spectacularly, so much so that no deviations had been detected for hundreds of years. But with the discovery of Uranus in 1781, something changed. While the newest planet appeared to move in an ellipse around the Sun, it seemed to move at the wrong speed compared to the predictions of the laws of gravity.

For the first 20 years or so since its discovery, it moved faster, from night-to-night and year-to-year, than the laws appeared to indicate. For the next 15-to-25 years, the planet appeared to move right at the rate expected from those laws. But then it slowed down further, and its speed dipped below gravity’s predictions.

A very old orrery of the planets and moons in the solar system. An examination of this points to an origin in the first half of the 19th century: well after the discovery of Uranus and some of its major moons, but before the discovery of Neptune. (ARMAGH OBSERVATORY, COLLEGE HILL)

In 1821 — forty years after Uranus was first discovered — astronomer Alexis Bouvard published his first table of results that he obtained through keen observations of the new, distant world. Either Newton’s laws were flawed, or, as Bouvard hypothesized, there was an eighth planet out there perturbing the orbit of Uranus.

English astronomer John Couch Adams, who would be 199 years old were he alive today, became quite smitten with this idea, and devoted the early part of his scientific career to studying this problem.

For decades, Uranus was observed to move too quickly (L), then at the correct speed (center), and then too slowly (R). This would be explained within Newton’s theory of gravitation if there were an additional, outer, massive world tugging on Uranus. In this visualization, Neptune is in blue, Uranus in green, with Jupiter and Saturn in cyan and orange, respectively. (MICHAEL RICHMOND OF R.I.T.)

Throughout the early 1840s, he attempted to predict exactly where the new, massive, outer world would need to be, in order to give contemporary astronomers a search target. When looking for a new, faint point of light in the sky, you must know exactly where to look. Getting a precise answer was extremely important.

By the mid-1840s, he was in communication with astronomers James Challis and George Airy about his predictions, but the planet failed to turn up. As it was, Adams had fired off a total of six letters in rapid succession in 1845/6 that contradicted one another, offering a variety of predictions. There were some mistakes in his work that needed refining, and the six predictions disagreed with one another with a range of 12°!

Perhaps heartbreakingly, at least one of his predictions was very much correct. (In fact, Challis himself, one of history’s most incompetent scientists, actually observed Neptune during at least one and possibly on two occasions, mistaking it for a star!)

Neptune was discovered way back in 1846, but was predicted by two men competing to discover it: John Couch Adams and Urbain Le Verrier. Today, the two main rings of Neptune are known as the Adams and Le Verrier rings. (NASA / VOYAGER 2)

And then every scientist’s nightmare happened to Adams: he was scooped! On August 31, 1846, Frenchman Urbain Le Verrier announced that he had computed the position of where this new planet must be, and sent off a letter to Germany and Johann Galle at the Berlin Observatory. The letter arrived in Berlin on September 23, and it was clear for observing that very evening. Galle and his assistant, d’Arrest, pointed their telescope towards the exact location Le Verrier predicted, and less than 1° away, there it was.

In April of 1990, the Voyager 2 spacecraft flew by Neptune, snapping a series of incredible images of our Solar System’s outermost planet. 150 years prior, nobody knew that our Solar System would wind up containing 8 planets, but a few scientists suspected, from the evidence of Uranus, that it might be out there. (Time Life Pictures/NASA/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images)

While many scientific figures in Great Britain lauded Adams as the equal of Le Verrier, assigning him the accolade of co-discoverer of Neptune, it simply wasn’t true. The Adams prize, still awarded today, was named for him in 1848 for his role in the discovery of Neptune, although he played no role in the actual discovery.

Yet Adams himself was incredibly humble about his own role. He submitted the following letter, with his observtions, to the Royal Astronomical Society in November of 1846:

I mention these dates merely to show that my results were arrived at independently, and previously to the publication of those of M. Le Verrier, and not with the intention of interfering with his just claims to the honours of the discovery ; for there is no doubt that his researches were first published to the world, and led to the actual discovery of the planet by Dr. Galle, so that the facts stated above cannot detract, in the slightest degree, from the credit due to M. Le Verrier.
Although he was unsuccessful in successfully discovering Neptune, Adams never attempted to falsely take credit for it. Even when credit was given to him, he always referred to the true discoverers, and did not count himself among them. (GEO KOMPAKT NR.21/DEZEMBER 2009, PAGE 138 (L), AND WIKIMEDIA COMMONS USER SKRAEMER (R))

For a lesser scientist, that might have been the end of his career, as Le Verrier was elevated to scientific superstardom. But not Adams. He continued to work on other important problems, making significant progress on determining the cause of deviations in the Moon’s orbital motion and parallax. We now know, today, that this effect is due to tidal acceleration, and Adams made significant progress on that front, winning the Gold Medal from the Royal Astronomical Society.

But it was a spectacular meteor storm in 1866 — the Leonids — that changed everything. The Leonid meteor shower of 1833, for which Adams was just a child of 14, was so spectacular the entire world took note. For every one of the next 32 years, the Leonids were quiet. But in 1866, it happened again: a Leonid storm so spectacular that it simply couldn’t be coincidence.

A meteor storm is characterized by showers of shooting stars that are so intense, they occur every few seconds on average. The meteor storm of 1833, associated with the Leonids, was a legendary outburst.(ADOLF VOLLMY, ENGRAVING FROM 1889)

British astronomer John Couch Adams came up with a theory about this meteor shower, these outbursts, and their origin:

  • The “shooting star” phenomenon is actually small dust grains that collide at rapid speeds with Earth’s atmosphere.
  • Meteor showers occur in the same region of the sky year-after-year because there’s dusty debris crossing Earth’s orbit that our planet passes through every year.
  • And this debris is spread out, but with a point-of-greatest-density that periodically collides with our planet, causing the most spectacular meteor showers.
Although, for many comets or asteroids, there is a higher density of debris associated with the location of the main body, over enough time, the debris will get smeared out along the orbit to such a sufficient degree that the meteor shower can become very consistent year-to-year. The Leonids have not yet reached that stage, and as such, they still peak roughly every 33.25 years. (GEHRZ, R. D., REACH, W. T., WOODWARD, C. E., AND KELLEY, M. S., 2006)

This theory applies to meteor streams encountering any planet, not just Earth. Adams theory was wild and novel, but conceivable. If he could find the parent body responsible for the Leonids, it would be a great validation of a speculative but compelling new idea.

His experience in calculating orbits, gained by his earlier struggles with Uranus and the then-hypothetical Neptune, allowed him to come through when it counted most. Adams calculated that there must be a cluster of dusty debris moving in an elongated elliptical orbit around the Sun with a period of 33.25 years, taking it out past Jupiter, Saturn, and even Uranus’ orbit. The orbit matched, in fact, the one taken by the newly discovered (in 1866) Comet Tempel-Tuttle, and led to the identification of meteor showers as being caused by cometary debris trails!

The debris stream of a comet, like Comet Encke (shown here), is the cause of meteor showers on Earth and all other worlds in the Solar System. John Couch Adams’ identification of Comet Tempel-Tuttle with the Leonid meteor shower was the first link ever made between these two phenomena. (NASA / GSFC)

After missing out on glory 20 years prior, Adams had finally succeeded in revolutionizing our view of the Universe. His identification of meteor showers with cometary debris trails stands as his greatest scientific achievement, and remains the leading theory more than 150 years later. In 1870, he was appointed the director of Cambridge Observatory, replacing the incompetent Challis. He was even offered the most prestigious astronomical position in all of Britain: that of Astronomer Royal, in 1881. He turned it down, preferring to continue his teaching and research in Cambridge. Ironically, had he accepted, he would have replaced Airy, meaning he could have succeeded both of the men responsible for failing to follow up on his predictions of Neptune!

After successfully identifying periodic comets as the sources of meteor showers, John Couch Adams’ enduring scientific legacy was secured. His emergence as a bearded style icon would only come long after his death. (SIR HUBERT VON HERKOMER)

Despite missing his chance at great glory in his early years through no fault of his own, Adams was never bitter. While later historians of science would blame Airy and Challis for their failings, Adams humbly accepted the blame himself, writing:

I could not expect however that practical astronomers, who were already fully occupied with important labours, would feel as much confidence in the results of my investigations, as I myself did.

He continued to work until the very end of his life, growing one of the most legendary beards in astronomy’s history along the way.

The final known picture of John Couch Adams was taken in 1888, shortly before he was afflicted with the long illness that took his life in 1892. Even at this late stage, his mind remained curious and his beard remained spectacular. (EDIS, OLIVE; EDIS, KATHARINE (1888))

Adams initial failure to calculate and find Neptune did not prevent him from having later success with the Moon’s orbital motion. It in no way inhibited him in his greatest achievement: identifying the source of meteor showers, and confirming that Comet Tempel-Tuttle causes the Leonids. Similarly, Le Verrier’s immediate success in predicting the existence of Neptune didn’t lead to future success; his prediction of the existence of Vulcan, a proposed planet interior to Mercury to explain its orbit, failed to materialize.

In science, making a successful advance not only requires skill, talent, and persistence, but also a fair bit of luck. You can make mistakes along the way, in theory, in practice, and in judgment, but every new problem you tackle is a new chance to get it right. Treat your failures for what they are: momentary setbacks. In no way do they define your destiny.


Starts With A Bang is now on Forbes, and republished on Medium thanks to our Patreon supporters. Ethan has authored two books, Beyond The Galaxy, and Treknology: The Science of Star Trek from Tricorders to Warp Drive.

Like what you read? Give Ethan Siegel a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.