The simulated decay of a black hole not only results in the emission of radiation, but the decay of the central orbiting mass that keeps most objects stable. Black holes are not static objects, but rather change over time. (THE EU’S COMMUNICATE SCIENCE)

This Is Why We’ll Never Detect Hawking Radiation From An Actual Black Hole

The theoretical reasons to expect it are compelling, but the technology required to detect it is unfathomable.

Ethan Siegel
8 min readJul 8, 2020

--

All throughout our galaxy, millions of black holes of a variety of masses orbit, subject to the same rules of gravitation as every other mass in the Universe. Only, instead of emitting light dependent on their surface area and temperature, they’re completely black. Whatever exists at the singularity that’s shrouded behind each black hole’s event horizon, we cannot see it. From within a black hole, nothing, not even light, can escape.

The only light we’ve ever observed from a black hole doesn’t come from inside the black hole itself, but rather from accelerated matter that interacts somewhere outside of the event horizon. However, there is a very particular type of light that black holes ought to emit: Hawking radiation, arguably the greatest breakthrough of Stephen Hawking’s scientific career. Unfortunately, it’s almost certain that we’ll never detect it. Here’s the science of why.

It takes a speed of 7.9 km/s to achieve “C” (stable orbit), while it takes a speed of 11.2 km/s for “E” to escape Earth’s gravity. Speeds less than “C” will fall back to Earth; speeds between “C” and “E” will remain bound to Earth in a stable orbit. This same logic, even with Newtonian mechanics alone, can be applied to an object of any mass, density, or size to determine its escape velocity. (BRIAN BRONDEL UNDER A C.C.A.-S.A.-3.0 LICENSE)

--

--

Ethan Siegel

The Universe is: Expanding, cooling, and dark. It starts with a bang! #Cosmology Science writer, astrophysicist, science communicator & NASA columnist.