3 Questions To Transition Out Of Anger Quickly
Anger isn’t as dangerous as we think. It’s not as useful, either. Here’s what you need to know.
“We cannot selectively numb emotions — when we numb the painful emotions, we also numb the positive emotions.”
- Brené Brown
Passion: the capacity to feel intensely, to experience life vividly, to care strongly. The opposite of apathy and indifference.
I’m a big fan of this. But we’re not talking about being emotionally unstable or dysregulated here. Which brings us to…
Emotional Intelligence: having the full range of healthy emotional response, recognizing your own and others’ emotions, understanding what’s going on, and taking appropriate action. Sometimes called EQ (the emotional analogue to IQ).
OK that all sounds great, but what about anger?
What if someone is passionately angry, is that good or bad? Does the idea of EQ embrace anger, or shun it? Isn’t anger abusive? What’s healthy and what’s not? Is anger to be avoided?
The short answer is that anger isn’t intrinsically dangerous in the way many people think it is… but it also isn’t intrinsically useful in the way that many people think it is. It’s an emotion. Just like happiness, sadness, or fear.
That said, in the spectrum of emotions there are a few things about anger that set it apart.
So here are some things to understand about it—now, while you (hopefully) are not in the thick of it — followed by three questions you can use when you are in the thick of it to help you quickly transition to something more useful.
Anger isn’t “effective”
“Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you will ever regret.” - Ambrose Bierce
“The best fighter is never angry.” - Lao Tzu
With other emotions — for example, when you’re wracked with sadness— you know you’re not operating at your best. It’s self-evident. But anger can deceive you into believing you’re the most capable, intelligent, sane human being on the planet.
That’s a problem, because it’s tempting to secretly believe that being angry is somehow effective.
That it’s a useful tool.
That you need to be angry in order to change something.
That you’re somehow more powerful when you’re angry.
That people respond to anger more readily than they do to other approaches.
That the alternative to anger is acquiescence or passivity.
You can see how these beliefs might work against you if your goal is to avoid or move past anger.
The idea that you’re more effective when you’re angry is roughly analogous to the idea you’re a better lover when you’re drunk.
Of the hundred-plus quotes I’ve come across on anger, a good two thirds of them are different ways to say, when you’re angry, you’re dumb, so don’t do that thing you think is so brilliant, because it’ll be worse than the thing you’re angry about.
So check in to see if some part of you consciously or unconsciously glorifies anger. And if so, take Lao Tzu’s advice and let go of the idea that anger is useful or necessary to get shit done. There are more effective tactics.
Anger delivers a dopamine hit
If you’re prone to bouts of anger, you may be habituated to the dopamine high that it gives you.
Yep, anger stimulates the reward centers and can become an addictive habit.
So when you feel that pull to get angry, you might find it helpful to notice how similar it is to a drug craving. Because that’s what it is.
Once you start to make different choices, and you’re not angry as often, or for as long, just be aware that you might, strangely, miss the feeling. Don’t be surprised if you have withdrawal symptoms.
Anger is not synonymous with abusive, assholish, or destructive behavior
I worked with a couple who fought. They took turns being mean to each other, then feeling remorseful and guilty, back and forth.
They both thought they were supposed to not get angry, that it was some kind of moral failing.
Their previous relationship counselor tended to try to reason the anger away, which only served to validate those beliefs further, without actually helping.
But anger is an emotion. Like happiness, sadness, or fear.
They didn’t have to not be angry. They had to learn how not to be mean. They needed to learn to catch where they turn contemptuous, or vengeful, or punitive, or spiteful. Where they become deliberately hurtful.
Those are true relationship killers.
(And they’re all learned behaviors.)
As they learned not to weaponize their anger, it became possible for them to be angry while continuing to be loving.
It became possible for them to vehemently, even passionately disagree while maintaining the high regard and respect they actually had for each other.
It became possible for them to have strong feelings in a way that wasn’t harmful. That didn’t cause wreckage. And this shift carried into their relationships with family, with colleagues, etc. as well.
So, no, being angry is not in any way synonymous with putting the people around you in harm’s way.
And by the way, a related skill, one I needed to learn, was not turning my anger inward. In not punishing other human beings with my anger, I needed to remember to include Ken Blackman on that list, too.
When you’re angry, the main thing to communicate is your anger
“When angry, count four. When very angry, swear.” - Mark Twain
It’s hard to express your desire, the change you want to see, and have the communication land when your own focus is still so strongly on your own displeasure. The emotional charge tends to drown out the request, undermining it.
You’re not in the space to put your attention there yourself—so don’t expect to be super effective at pointing the listener there. Not yet.
(This isn’t strange. Emotions in general can impair us. Anger in particular can also trick us.)
Think of anger as a response, whose focus is on what happened, and whose native language is displeasure and complaint. Whatever your choice of words your underlying communication is about the past and your current emotional state.
From an EQ point of view, that in itself can be very useful to express!
A request has the power to set in motion the changes you want to see… but only as early as now, and moving forward. Sorry, no earlier. Making a request requires you, the communicator, having chosen to turn your focus forward.
And that may mean handling the emotion, as an emotion, first.
Anger feeds on partial truth
“Anger at lies lasts forever. Anger at truth can’t last.” - Greg Evans
“God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference.” - Reinhold Niebuhr
When I’m angry, there’s something I see, and something I don’t.
I see enough to see that something is wrong… but if I saw everything and everyone with perfect clarity, I wouldn’t be angry.
In a down-to-earth sense, the more I know, the more I shift from anger to that state described by the Serenity Prayer —
I regain my sense of empathy, love, compassion and acceptance…. but I also gain clarity, purpose, and the ability to take powerful, effective action to bring about change.
If I can’t access either side of the Serenity equation, there’s something I’m not seeing, something more for me to know.
Curiosity can get me unstuck.
The partial truth may be about oneself
Anger is sometimes used as a protective defense mechanism to cover up other, more vulnerable feelings—usually either hurt, or shame.
(There’s even a name for using anger to cover up for shame: hiding and biting. If you’ve ever seen someone who feels guilty lash out incongruously, as if they were wronged themselves, that’s hiding and biting.)
Needless to say, you’re better off confronting the underlying feeling than covering it up with anger.
So here are three questions to transition out of anger quickly:
1. What am I not seeing?
2. What am I trying to protect myself from feeling?
3. What is my request?
Copyright © 2018 by Ken Blackman. All rights reserved.
About the author:
Ken Blackman has worked with hundreds of couples from San Francisco to Paris to Sydney, and trained thousands of students in his workshops on intimacy and connection. His work has received attention everywhere from Cosmopolitan to Business Insider to Playboy. With nearly two decades of experience, Ken’s powerful, unapologetic break from conventional relationship advice is shifting the world conversation around love and committed coupledom.