Designing for Truth: Google Scholar Concept

Svilen
Svilen
Feb 8, 2018 · 7 min read

Imagine you wake up one morning to an emailed article from your aunt, warning you not to vaccinate your newborn son. You worryingly open the link and read that a study published in The Lancet (one of the most reputable scientific journals in the world) has conclusively found that vaccines cause autism. The PDF of the actual study seems legitimate, however your lack of medical expertise prevent you from understanding or easily discrediting it. After all, it’s been published by The Lancet, has a dozen citations, and the article makes a reasonable argument. You may choose to research further, but some just may be convinced and re-share it on Facebook to warn other parents of the dangers of vaccination.

This is how misinformation happens.

The study in question is in fact real- authored by Andrew Wakefield and published in The Lancet in 1999. But what your aunt’s article left out is that the study has been fully retracted in 2010 due to data manipulation and Wakefield’s medical license has been revoked. The incident has come to be widely regarded as a major catalyst of the Anti-Vaccination movement, which is responsible for outbreaks of previously controlled diseases like measles and mumps, leading to many deaths.

Truth Compass

We’re in the midst of an epistemological crisis as a result of rampant misinformation which we either don’t have the time or expertise to verify. Although not perfect, science is the best tool we have to arrive at truth, as it produces the fundamental facts on which opinions, beliefs and world politics are based upon. However there many challenges to identifying credible research:

  1. Out of reach- technical jargon, dense text, and frequent paywalls make scientific research virtually inaccessible to the masses, leaving us reliant on the media for translation.

How are we to know if a study in an article has been revised or retracted?

How credible is a study which cites retracted or outdated studies?

Is a study published by a private organization with conflict of interests?

Does the author have a documented history of fraud?

Current efforts like RetractionWatch.com keep track of retracted papers, along with the most highly cited retractions and a leaderboard of authors with the highest retraction count. Although a step in the right direction, visiting a site every time you want to verify a study or an author is burdensome and doesn’t scale.

Google Scholar Browser Extension

Perhaps one of Google’s more underrated projects is Google Scholar- a free database of ~150 million peer-reviewed academic journals, books, conference papers, theses, dissertations, and even court opinions and patents.

I envision a Google Scholar browser extension that detects retracted or outdated documents, warns if a study’s citation is no longer valid, alerts of authors with documented fraud, and notifies of privately funded studies, in hopes of helping readers establish credibility.

Let’s revisit your aunt’s article from earlier, with the Google Scholar extension installed:

When you open the article, your Google Scholar browser extension warns you it’s detected a bad study in the article:

As you start reading, you notice a link to the study in question is highlighted:

Clicking “View Details” or the extension icon brings up information cards with more details:

Info Cards consists of 7 sections:

  • Warning (if applicable) .

There are various severity states for each UI element of the extension:

In case of multiple documents, the Extension Icon displays the number of highest severity documents (if there’s 2 retracted and 4 nonclassified, the icon will be red with the number 2)

Info Card links lead to Google Scholar’s corresponding pages:

Research

I started by researching how information was disseminated and consulted a PhD friend of mine. I mapped out the relationships between the major players in the scientific news ecosystem:

  • Authors (professors) perform science research

After some digging, it becomes obvious that nearly all players are incentivized to act in self-interest:

  • Authors- valuable research findings = career advancement

These findings further reinforce the need for such an extension.

Next up, I mapped out the current navigation of Google Scholar:

Afterwards, I planned out the functionality I envisioned and navigation between pages:

Future Steps

The downside of browser extensions is that they don’t work on mobile. A possible solution would be a dedicated mobile browser or to bake the functionality in Google Chrome (android/iOS). Additionally, there are some interesting future possibilities:

  • A.I.- machine learning could eventually parse through semantics, and create meaningful relationships between Google Scholars’ database that could lead to further insight. AI could eventually be the ultimate peer reviewer, and B.S. detector, as it makes sense of all academic literature by detecting previously unnoticed patterns.

My longterm vision is a truth mechanism that extends beyond science, to news articles, blogs, tweets, sites, and even ebooks, by incorporating services like FactCheck, Snopes, FiB, B.S. Detector, and MediaBias.

The Russian influence on the 2016 US Presidential Elections is a testament to the power of weaponized information. In an age where social media has become a primary news source for many, reliability and credibility have faded, and in many cases outright disappeared. False information has become a major force that’s shaping our world as it’s cheaper and easier than ever to manufacture and propagate. This concept is just one approach to a much broader and complex problem, as we’re in desperate need of tools to guard us against misinformation

PS: Several days after finalizing this article, the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative announced the Computable Knowledge Project, which aims to comprehensively connect and comprehend scientific papers using AI.

Svilen's Realm

My concepts, designs & inventions

Svilen's Realm

I invent, design and craft experiences and solutions ranging from reimagining the mundane to protecting fundamental human rights. I share my visions with the world through the language of design, film, and writing.

Svilen

Written by

Svilen

Speculative Designer | creator of RubixToolkit.com & DesignSecrets.org

Svilen's Realm

I invent, design and craft experiences and solutions ranging from reimagining the mundane to protecting fundamental human rights. I share my visions with the world through the language of design, film, and writing.

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store