6. Black Holes or Black Eyes?

Fred-Rick
The Startup
Published in
16 min readSep 8, 2018

--

In the picture a hurricane viewed from space, meant as an example for a Black Hole with the empty eye as center.
“tornado screengrab” by NASA on Unsplash

Any big-picture structure can get created with broad strokes and should therefore not be all that complicated to discuss. Simple questions can get asked about the whole. One such question is whether the whole is somehow a unified whole with everything based on a not yet known single principle, or whether the parts are to some extent always independent — with as conclusion that an ultimately unified result cannot exist. This question and its answer can make us change the way we view Black Holes.

It is a fundamental question, and though we can want and eat our cake indeed, we can never eat it two times. At the overall level, the answer to this question is either a single principle or multiple self-based parts; we cannot have both. With separation as a universal aspect for time, space, and matter, the answer can only be that our universe is like the egg that was broken to bake the omelet. This answer applies to the immaterialized aspects of our universe as well; with a material universe separated in essence, the immaterialized realities cannot simply make up for the disconnect and make the egg whole again.

Once accepted, it is fairly simple to see that matter in our universe behaves in two distinct ways that cannot be combined into a single action. With the Big Bang or Big Whisper, all matter is seen as floating outwardly. And yet, at the local level, we see grouping as…

--

--