Your ICO Email is Bad and You Should Feel Bad
I tend not to pick on people sending me cold emails. I get enough of them and I make myself pretty open to receiving email that if I picked on every person who sent me a shitty email, I’d have blog content that would outlast conflicts in the Middle East.
Yet spam around Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) gets to me.
I don’t know exactly why. It might be because I was initially excited about ICOs when they first came on the scene. Here was a way for early stage companies to raise money without having to get into the Sarbanes-Oxley fueled nightmare that is late-stage venture capital funding (see my friend Michael Gibson’s tweet here). Here was a market force that could really democratize private investing and sidestep accredited investors.
Instead, most amounted to little more than vaporware. 59% of 2017’s ICOs failed. Not just, “we ran out of money but we tested the market” failed. Instead, “we’re abandoning the project altogether and we don’t have anything to show for it and, no, you don’t get your money back.”
Even worse, pump and dump schemes run amok in the ICO world. There are actual subscription groups that coordinate the mass buying of tokens before a major announcement. Then, after the dupes buy in, they coordinate a mass-sell, crashing the price.
(Yes, this is illegal with stocks.)
I was once excited about these projects.
Now, I would rather get spam from a Nigerian prince telling me that a distant relative of mine that he knew bequeathed a large sum of (non-cryptocurrency) money to me than get cold emails from yet another ICO “blockchain entrepreneur” with no clear value-add for me.
Over the last year, I received so many (poorly written) cold emails from ICO “entrepreneurs” looking for “investors” that, now, emails with “investor” in the body tend to get caught by my spam filter. That’s a huge annoyance considering the work I do.
The “Invest In My ICO” Email
This spam bothers me not just because the ICO market over the last year gives a bad name to a technology with a lot of potential. It bothers me because the emails are so poorly written. So poorly written that I sometimes wonder, “whoever actually bites on this deserves to lose their money they put in.”
One rolled into my inbox earlier tonight (the impetus for this post).
At first glance, this is a half-decent email. He tells me who he is (founder of this crypto company), what he’s doing (raising $2 million at an 80% discount), and what he wants (to send me more info or jump on a call). It’s so half-decent that it would trick the sender into thinking it’s a good email. My rule for half-decent? Round down.
The questions that immediately raced through my mind were:
- Who are you?
- How did you get my email address? (Okay, I make it relatively public, but still.)
- Why the hell are you emailing me about this? Why should I care?
- What do you want from me? To invest? To introduce you to people? To review your deck?
- Why did you sign off your email with a half-question?
Notice that my questions actually don’t have anything to do with the substance of his pitch. This isn’t because I’m nit-picking. It’s because his email is so bad that most people can’t be bothered to engage with the substance of his pitch until he proves to them why he’s emailing them and why they should listen to him.
Before sitting down to write this piece, I wanted to confirm I didn’t know this guy and give him my info. A quick Twitter and LinkedIn search shows me that nope, I don’t know him. He’s just spamming people.
The “blockchain entrepreneur” in this email has two stages he has to set up for his email:
- This is why you should listen to me.
- This is what I want to tell you about.
He doesn’t really succeed at either. He doesn’t give enough context to figure out who he is, how he got my info, why he’s emailing me, and why I should listen to him. Then his pitch for his ICO is so sparse that I have no idea what it does. “A rewards-based advertising token that pays dividends to its holders”?
What?
Want to see how I would re-write this email so that it could stand a chance of working? Read more here.
This story is published in The Startup, Medium’s largest entrepreneurship publication followed by 316,638+ people.
Subscribe to receive our top stories here.
