In the process of signing up, I appear to have written my response as an independent story. So here, as intended, a desperately sincere duplicate:

It is a measure of the seriousness of the issues involved — the survival of civilization itself — that several of the authors involved have shed their anonymity to present the…

Why did you start lying to yourself?

Did it seem just that easy? To shift the blame?

To look on as the responsibility you should have taken for yourself was dished elsewhere?

It felt good. You avoided the judgement of others. You avoided being scolded. You avoided punishment…

David, if you had followed the link you’d have discovered that the link wasn’t to the main report, it was to a report to the commission prepared by scientists from the Bushfire CRC, The Australian Bureau of Meteorology and the CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research. I didn’t expect you to read it. As I said, it wouldn’t interest climate science…

Thanks for your interest. I looked over that article, it added nothing knew and was quite lame in my view. We’ve already covered the points in our original article here at Medium. I believe the authors were merely wanting to re-emphasise that they are conspiracy theorists who don’t “believe” in science. They’d rather “believe” that climate science is…

Oh, a “bring back the dinosaurs” comment. Lovely.

For lurkers — the sun was fainter way back when CO2 was much higher than today. The land masses were very different as well. If you are angling for CO2 in the ‘000s, be prepared for an even faster 6th major extinction. And be prepared for vast areas of land being…

David, after falsely accusing me of fraud here and elsewhere (on your favoured climate conspiracy blog), you’ve lost the right to launch into tone troll mode when I point out that you don’t give a damn for the future of Australia, particularly for those of us who do live in the bush.