Personally, in my alternate-dimensional reality, “real crop advisors” won’t be attached to synthetic chemicals — period.
If our goals include reducing chemical fertilizer and pesticide applications — ie, we agree those are “good outcomes” — then why stop there? Why not eliminate rather than reduce?
I’ve been following that OOO (out of office?) rabbit hole a little today and agree it’s a bit hard to follow. Why we all gotta be objects? A couple of good quotes in this link: