Court Case
Buffet, Vegetarian- Non-Vegetarian
Missing Information
The court is chock-full of people descending into the pattern of the cross & knots with their minds on the case, filtering on the outcome with their stabbing vests & underwear due to air-conditioning defeated by the unexpected outnumbered strength.
A Bailiff who disappeared from the chamber produced the Judge halt because everyone would underestimate his bearing without an announcement. The Bailiff, wheezing controlling on his breath, reached rushing to the scene. Retorts I went to the wrong room where a Judge was previously present, ignoring everybody I carried forward in my announcement as disregarded my spectacles in the house.
The present Bailiff gave me a code language signal which made me understand by getting hit by his shoe on my expression. I shoved back with full force, supposedly to him as we transmit it back, to avoid unnecessary convenience. My stunt allegedly hit the Judge. As everyone stated: He was on the verge of hitting the hammer; he hit it on himself. I think he’s drunk.
The Bailiff taking his position had shrieked out Cuckoo-Doo. Would you please upsurge the Honorable Judge Turkey presiding?
Your Honor, today’s case is against the Animal Reign versus the Human Race.
Judge- You got the prosecution and the defense ready?
Bubble and Gum have risen from their deep slumber.
Yes, Your Honor.
Bailiff — The Prosecution Bubble can proceed to dispel everyone’s doubt.
Bubble — Your Honor, the case is simple, which, if understood with less stress on your wit. The human race is steering to a restaurant to hog a buffet. The server, as the call of duty, question your alternative onboard Veg Or Non-Veg.
Then later captures you after confirming Non-Veg you are savoring the vegetable dishes; you accord to pay additional. The word Non-Veg in itself has the answer tucked away in it No Veg.
The lawsuit is pointless, your Honor.
Bailiff — Bubble let the Judge decide on the case, sustaining a point or not. Ask to respect the dress code of the court. Would you mind zipping your pants, which is stressful to make a point?
Bailiff — Defense Gum may proceed with rendering Bubble defenseless.
Gum — My client Einstein poorly quoted he was open on his tastebuds said Omnivorous. Which meant focusing equally on vegetarian plus non-vegetarian as our forefathers were animals when they enjoyed a buffet agreed on Herbivorous, Omnivorous & Carnivorous.
Why should we have a separate split? Restaurants should stop mocking the human race and have three choices on the buffet.
Further to hold my statement, I have evidence to defend my client, Einstein.
- The day he went to the restaurant in the morning, his web hunt showed the pronunciation check for “Omnivore.”
- He delivers a video with his pet, who shares the same taste bud on practicing the pronunciation with his dog assured via a yoga dog poses & then gives a high five.
- My client can never lose sight of his taste buds as in one pocket; you can invariably track down a roasted chicken leg and another pocket a radish leaf.
Judge — The culpable restaurant has to send a month of food to the Einsteins house according to a herbivore, omnivore, and carnivore choices.
