And-Or
It is impossible to have ‘or’ without ‘and.’ Exposing the major flaw in all of ‘technology.’ And all of human ‘thinking,’ actually.
It is impossible to have a half without a whole. And, always, vice versa.
Meaning, it’s impossible to have a circumference without a diameter.
Meaning it is impossible to have the human concept ‘or’ without the human concept ‘and.’
This exposes the major flaw with human ‘technological’ ‘advances.’
Technology, as it is now deployed, is based on ‘information’ as a set of always-separated ‘zeros’ and ‘ones.’
However, as proven above, it is impossible to separate a zero (circumference) and a one (diameter) (without joining them).
This is the major mistake made by ancient mathematicians (including and especially Euclid), where the circumference of a circle is known to humans (programmed into humans, currently) as a ‘circle.’ And the diameter of a circle is known to humans (programmed into humans, currently) as a ‘line.’
Where, technically, the above diagram is the correct diagram for both a circumference and a diameter (because it is impossible to have one without the other).
We can decide to move away from this major error by rethinking, relearning, and then redeploying an ‘and-or’ basis for information (the human’s experience of ‘reality’ in general).
Details here: https://circular-theory.squarespace.com
See, also:
Quantum Entanglement on All Levels | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Jun, 2024 | Medium
