Figuring Out the ‘First Born’ Dilemma

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
2 min readMay 30, 2018

There is no ‘first’ on a circle.

First and second. (Photo by Kevin Gent)

The first born is in love with, and married to, the mother. While the second born is in love with, and married to, the father. Meaning, the first born is ‘father’ and the second born is ‘mother’ and they will take these ‘roles’ into reality, loving and hating, evenly, half-the-time. This explains everything about everything (complementarity is the basis for identity).

If you are born on (within 30 degrees) of the solstice, you were conceived on the equinox (and, always, vice versa). Meaning, a hidden circle (the ancients called this light and dark) is always in control. The solstice is ruled by the sun (hot and cold), while the equinox is ruled by the moon (50–50).

Meaning you can’t have first without second, or, more realistically, there is no ‘first’ on a circle (there is always an ‘other’ involved).

All of us play both roles (active sun) (passive moon) (direct or reflected light) half-the-time (born on the solstice, conceived on the equinox) (born on the equinox, conceived on the solstice). East sees west, south sees north. West and north must argue about who sees what.

This means first and-or second, half-the-time we’re in control, and the other half, not-so-much.

First and second. 50–50. Sun and moon.

Explaining why babies cry, why children fight, why adults insult each other.

Why all of us hate to ‘lose control.’ And, also, why it’s not possible not to ‘lose’ control, eventually.

Therefore you can’t have love without hate, X without Y, zero without one, because it all boils down to a hidden circle that is surreptitiously in ‘control.’

Meaning, it’s time to take some notice.

Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in nature (50–50 is the constant and the norm).

https://www.amazon.com/Circular-Theory-Ilexa-Yardley-ebook/dp/B0046ZS1KQ

--

--