Taking a fresh look at the ‘circle…
We cannot say when the ‘circle’ was ‘invented.’ We know it had to be before the pyramids, since the triangle (or pyramid, so to speak) is comprised of many uber-simple ‘lines…’ And you cannot have a ‘line’ in Nature, without the diameter of a ‘circle.’
That is, the ‘line’ and the ‘circle’ are, quite literally, ‘one’ and ‘zero.’ And this accounts for the ‘genesis’ of a ‘circle.’ And, also, then, both ‘zero’ and ‘one.’ (The genesis of ‘everything,’ technically.)
Zero, and one, is (are), by correspondence, and deduction, circumference and diameter (0) (1).
In a ‘realistic’ diagram, it looks like this:
If you look, carefully, at the ‘diagram,’ you will notice, it could be named ‘female’ and ‘male.’
And, we don’t have to go any further, then, to understand where we, as humans, came up with the ‘zero’ and the ‘one.’
Explaining how the pyramids were built:
Meaning you cannot have a noun without a verb, and, always, vice versa, because you cannot have a circumference without a diagram. Conventional drawings of the ‘circle’ rely on ‘circumference’ without mentioning (or noticing) a circumference as a drawing (or diagram) must always, also, be a diameter.
This, they ‘figured out.’ Except, they didn’t get the ‘diagram’ right.
Now, we have the ‘correct’ diagram (for both circumference and diameter).
All the rest is more of the same (hyper-redundant). The diagram tells us what’s happening everywhere. Whether we are aware of it. Or not.
Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in Nature. Easily deduced. And ‘observed.’ As we have done, now, both of us, from the diagram(s) above.
We’re way ahead of, and, also, behind, then, the ‘astrologers’ (physicists and mathematicians) (technologists and biologists).
Click on the links in the article for a ‘deeper’ understanding of Nature. And, yes, you can ‘get there,’ on your own. You don’t need experts to tell you what you ‘already’ know (what is impossible not-to-know) ‘on-your-own.’