How Einstein (and Galileo) Screwed Up Physics
All about inertia. No such thing as ‘inertia.’
No Such Thing As Zero
There’s no such thing as an ‘inertial’ frame. A ‘zero’ is the ‘circumference’ of an uber-simple circle. Explaining radiation, rotation, revolution (and everything else in Nature) (sexual reproduction).
This explains how (and, also, why, for the ‘deep’ thinker) Einstein, and, also, Galileo, screwed up physics.
Ancient astrologers used the ‘earth’ as ‘center’ because the ‘earth,’ is, from the human’s point of view, the ‘observation’ point (the natural ‘observer’). They knew, there is no such thing as an ‘inertial’ frame.
No Such Thing as ‘One’
Galileo thought he had outsmarted astrologers with his ‘knowledge’ of mathematics (gravitational ‘lensing’) by focusing attention on the ‘sun.’ Something that has carried down to this ‘day.’ Where, we all believe, in one way or an other, the ‘sun’ is the ‘basis point’ for ‘light.’
Einstein followed on, substituting the word ‘energy’ for ‘light,’ where, instead of ‘sun’, the ancient astrologers substituted the word ‘darkness’ for ‘light,’ in order to account for the obvious circular ‘nature’ of ‘Nature.’ (Complementarity as the basis for identity (basic observation)).
Again, all of them, astrologers, Galileo, Einstein, were forced to use an ‘observer’ as the basis for ‘light.’ (Astrology is the basis for both mathematics and physics) (basic complementarity in Nature).
No Such Thing As Light
This required (still requires) an ‘inertial’ frame. Where zero has to, eventually, become ‘one.’ Meaning, you can call this a ‘topology,’ but, in actuality, it is nothing more than an uber-simple circle. Where everything shares a ‘circle’ with everything else, meaning, there’s no such thing as ‘everything’ or ‘everything else.’ (You have to use this diagram if you want to understand what’s really going on.)
Meaning, light and dark (energy and mass), are defining a circle as the ‘inertial’ frame. There’s an obvious circle between any two observers, and, you cannot have a single observer, anywhere, in Nature. Meaning, pi is the basis for ‘observation’ in Nature (what the astrologers missed).
Therefore, the solstice and the equinox define everything (again, a simple, singular relationship between the numbers (if you believe in numbers) ‘one’ and ‘two’). Where, if you are born on a ‘solstice,’ you are ‘conceived on an equinox.’
No Such Thing As ‘Originating Point’
Where solstice is an originating point (observer) on an always-conserved circle (observation) (equinox) (the number ‘two’). Where you can’t have conception without birth. Solstice without equinox.
Where, technically, whether you realize it or not, pi, then, is the only ‘observer.’
So, there it is. Conservation of the circle is the core (and the only) dynamic in Nature. Allowing us to ‘define’ and ‘think about’ our ‘observations.’
