No Such Thing as Inertia (Or, An Inertial Frame)
Out-thinking Einstein. Go for it!
There’s no such thing as an ‘inertial’ frame. This is uber-easy to ‘prove’ (if you believe ‘proof’ is ‘required.’)
The above ‘diagram’ is an abstract-construction (a concrete version of ‘reality’) that articulates a circle (circumference and diameter) (one and two) (zero and one).
This is what Einstein missed. That you ‘get.’ That every ‘one’ of us, gets.
The number ‘two’ is constant. 50–50 (reversion to the mean) is the ‘norm.’
Where, technically, there’s no such thing as ‘norm.’
Again, the diagram above proves this. Explaining why everything changes, even though nothing changes. Meaning: no such thing as inertia. Therefore, no such thing as ‘inertial frame,’ and, also, no such thing, technically, as ‘frame.’
Meaning, you can’t use numbers or words to ‘technically’ describe (explain, measure) reality. You have to use the diagram above, if you want to be ‘technically’ correct (zero and one is any X and-or Y).
Why?
Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in (and, therefore, the basis for) (any rendering of) ‘reality.’ Explaining the ‘chaos’ that we know as ‘cognitive dissonance’ called ‘any person’s version of ‘reality.’’
