Solstice and Equinox: Uncovering The Validity Of Astrology

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
2 min readJun 23, 2018

Why astrology (MBTI)(cognitive ‘style’) is, continually, valid (for some).

Everyone is born on a solstice. Which is, always, connected, directly, and indirectly, to an equinox. Via an ever-present, uber-simple, circle. Where solstice is, technically, defined ‘an originating point’ on a circle.

It looks like this:

Solstice and equinox.

Where a ‘solstice’ is controlled by the ‘sun,’ and ‘equinox’ is controlled by the ‘moon,’ explaining direct, and indirect (reflected) light, where you can’t have one without the ‘other.’

Explaining extroverted, and, therefore, introverted, behavior. Which is the basis for ‘astrology,’ and, also, then, ‘mathematics.’

Meaning, it’s not possible to be an ‘extrovert’ or an ‘introvert.’ You have to be both in order to be either. Therefore we’re all 50–50 introvert-extrovert.

Introvert. Extrovert.

This untangles ‘astrology’ after several thousand years’ practice. Where astrological symbolism is the basis for technology (again, ancient yin and yang is modern zero and one).

Yin and yang. Zero and one.

Where you can ‘begin’ to see the underlying ‘unity’ in nature (philosophy, mathematics). Just by ‘following’ the ‘diagrams’ above.

Where all of the diagrams are the same, yet different, abstract, yet concrete, where you cannot have any X without Y. (Explaining genetics, neuroscience, and all of the other ‘big ideas,’ we seek to understand in ‘nature.’) If X, then Y (if Y, then X). Meaning, again, you can’t have ‘one’ without an ‘other.’

If you are ‘born’ on a solstice, you are, necessarily, ‘conceived’ on an equinox, and, always, vice versa, and, also, it is not possible to be born, or conceived on ‘neither’ (or both). (Explaining both ‘negation’ and ‘duplication.’)

Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in nature. Easy for any ‘one’ to ‘see.’

https://www.amazon.com/Circularity-Natures-Constant-Yang-Zero-ebook/dp/B07DV16RB9

--

--