The Circle of Time
‘One’ and ‘Two.’ (Zero and one).
Time moves in a straight line. Which is both diameter and circumference of a circle.
Meaning, Nature cannot negotiate (translate: differentiate) between a ‘one’ and a ‘two.’ (A ‘zero’ and a ‘one.’)
This is why, technically, time moves backward while a human moves ‘forward.’ Where the words ‘backward’ and ‘forward’ are nebulous and meaningless, because you need both to have either. So, therefore, they ‘cancel’ each other out. (Any movement makes the opposing movement ‘real.’)
This means, you can think of time as a concrete abstraction. It looks like this, obviously.
Meaning, if you choose to use ‘time’ as a ‘negotiator,’ it moves in any and all directions. Explaining the whole idea of ‘field.’
Meaning you cannot have yin without yang (ancient) and you cannot have zero without one (modern) meaning you cannot have ‘male’ without ‘female’ (technology).
Explaining a basic circuit.
Therefore, we are always negotiating the ‘circle’ of time. (The circle in general.) And, on one level or another, we all ‘know’ this.
Because ‘pi’ then is the technical (technological) term for ‘mind.’ A human mind. And, universal mind. The background ‘state’ for a circuit. The background state for everything.
Giving us universal time. Time in general. Cycles per minute (X per Y) (gigabytes/second) (division in general) (speed in general). (Mathematics in general.) (Operations in general.)
This explains the semi-conductor on its most basic level. Because it explains movement on its most basic level. That is, it is impossible to have a zero without a one (a null space without an ‘other’ null space). Explaining logic gates and unicode.
Thus, the diagram gives the architecture for the most efficient, and effective, ‘computer.’ Which is, always, nothing more, and nothing less than, an uber simple circle (pi as the unicode for circumference) (zero as the unicode for one).
Conservation of the circle explains time, and how, and, more important, why, we can mix up time, and use it any way we want.
Continue with: Natural Language Processing. Three ‘layers’ not-two. (Two layers… | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Jan, 2021 | Medium
See, especially, The Grounding Problem
