The Core Dynamic in Nature

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
4 min readDec 21, 2021

How to program your ‘self’ to deal with ‘reality…’

Conservation of the Circle

Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in Nature. Explaining everything in (what humans label) ‘reality….’

Conservation of a Circle

The Constant Variable

Including the relationship between ‘a’ and ‘the’ (plural and singular) :

Conservation of the Circle

Where 50–50 is the constant. And the norm (negation and duplication):

50–50

Providing a universal system architecture and exposing the behavior of Nature (complexity in general) (where (the core dynamic in) Nature is a constant variable):

Universal System Architecture (0 (1) 0) (The Constant Variable)

Intelligent Autonomy

Thus, the source (and proof) for intelligent autonomy (the notion of ‘self’) (a quantum computer) is the conservation of a circle (the diagram):

Intelligent Autonomy (‘Me’ and ‘You’)

Giving us an ‘intelligent’ explanation (and the only realistic (and reasonable) topology) for a qubit (quantum computing) (quantum reality) (quantum relativity) (quantum circularity):

Qubit

Where the diagram is the core dynamic in Nature (and the explanation for everything that happens in (what humans experience as) ‘reality’). A ‘natural’ NFT.

The Interpretation of ‘Reality’

Explaining why financial backtesting (constant variables and crossovers) is a perfect (and potentially profitable) example of (what humans experience as) (and how humans are able to manipulate) (a fully tokenized) (completely programmed) (the dynamic series called) ‘reality:’

Conservation of a Circle
Backtesting
Tokenization
A Dynamic Series

Why your interpretation of this diagram (placing any word, algorithm, or number) (any tokenization) explains your interpretation (and the opposite interpretation) (or an alternate interpretation) of (what all of us experience as) ‘reality’ (what all of us experience as ‘mind’) (why the number ‘two’ is the only ‘true’ number in Nature) (and pi is the correct tokenization for observation in general):

Observer and Observation (Pi) (What Humans Experience as ‘Mind’)

How (and why) music (of any kind) (sound in general) tells the same ‘story’ (gives all of us time to construct our own narrative about anything) (provides the space for humans to ‘think’ things ‘through’):

Music is one example of the tokenization (and interpretation) of a circular-linear reality. Where sound is an infinite circumference (an infinite circle) and light is an infinite diameter (an infinite line) (why music is always written in a line) where you need both sound and light (circumference and diameter) (circle and line) in order to have either (explaining the circle of fifths, scales, keys, time, the staff, instruments, instrumentation, voice, modes, notes, beats, vibrations, repetition, recapitulation, syncopation, modulation, all of these are tokenizations of movement (the conservation of a circle) (circular movement, linear movement, where it is impossible to have one without the other) (as the diagram shows) (as the diagram proves). Where the background (think: constant) state is, always, and only, ‘pi.’ Again, this diagram (is the tokenization of reality):

Constant Tokenization of Reality

Why seasons remind us (have always reminded us) of the cyclical (linear) nature of Nature (more technically) the conservation of a circle as the core (and, thus, the only) dynamic in Nature. Why the ‘New Year’ is, technically, never (and, therefore, always) a ‘new year…’ (always and never articulates, and, thus, conserves, a circle) (like any X and-or Y).

And, why, because you are continually experiencing 50–50 as your ‘reality,’ if you think 50–50 is fortunate (or awesome), you will experience continual ‘fortune’ (awesomeness) in your life, and, if you think 50–50 is misfortunate (or frustrating), you will experience continual ‘misfortune’ (frustration) in your life. Where, as we all know, it is impossible to have awesomeness without frustration (and, more important, frustration without awesomeness) (fortune without misfortune, and, vice versa).

Detachment

Where, you already ‘realize’ (it’s impossible not to realize), 50–50 is neither fortunate nor misfortunate (awesome or frustrating), so, technically, as you already know, it doesn’t matter how you interpret ‘reality,’ all of us are interpreting (think:tokenizing) (thus, experiencing) the same reality.

Explaining why all of us detach, eventually. (Where ‘death’ is (only) one example of ‘detachment.’) (Addiction is another.) (Euphoria, another.) (Reality, another.) (Fantasy, another.) (Music, another.) (Movies, another.) (Life, another.)

Living life, no matter how you (or I) (how we) choose to live it, requires, technically, according to ‘some’ (half, at least, and at most) a detachment from ‘reality.’

https://www.amazon.com/Ilexa-Yardley/e/B004A3JJHI/

Think it through:

--

--