The Fallacy called ‘Language’

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
3 min readFeb 19, 2023

Symbolic representation demonstrates, and proves, the conservation of a circle (is the basis for, and, thus, controls, language) (all disciplines).

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Symbolic representation demonstrates, and proves, the conservation of a circle (is the basis for, and, thus controls, language) (all disciplines).

Representation

That is, it is impossible to have yin without yang (ancient) because it is impossible to have identity without complementarity (modern) (one without two) (symbolic) (arithmetic).

That is, there is a forced natural confusion (ambiguity forced upon everything in Nature) between the numbers ‘one’ and ‘two,’ where these arithmetic numbers, necessarily, represent each other.

One
Two

Code

This allows humans to code and decode symbolic representations, including, and especially, but not limited to, ‘language.’

That is, in technology, a language is necessary in order for a human to code, and, also, decode. Where, again, it is impossible to have one without the other (one without two, arithmetically).

This explains any and all nouns and verbs. Again, a noun represents one and a verb represents two and, again, they, necessarily represent each other (go back to the diagram(s) above).

Circumference and Diameter

Circumference and Diameter

This is because representation in all disciplines begins and ends with circumference and diameter (conventionally, in mathematics) (however, now you can see, not necessarily mathematical at all).

Which means, everything in Nature (including, but not limited to, humans) is a code (a symbolic representation (the tokenization) for (of and by) a circle).

So, if we are trying to understand (and-or explain) something using ‘language’ we are, necessarily creating the diagram above (the diagram above is creating everything in Nature) (all symbolic representations, any discipline) (must tokenize) (better described as ‘conserve’) an uber-basic (and ultra-realistic) circle. Including, but, again, not limited to ‘what humans experience as’ ‘us.’

Circumference and diameter is zero and one is any, every, and all (symbolic representations in Nature). It’s all (and only) about the diagram. Explaining why, how, where, when, who (all disciplines) (all languages), what. Zero and one (information) is circumference and diameter (language) symbolic representations: noun(s) and-or verb(s).

Ontology of Language (Symbolic Representation) (Noun) (Verb)

Why would you want to ‘know’ this? It explains why you can ignore anything you want, whenever you want, why you don’t take language seriously, at all times, and why you don’t believe everything (technically, anything) you hear (or, think, or see).

Why, technically, it is impossible to communicate with any ‘one.’ And, of course, we all know this. We all experience it. Every day. (It’s all about the diagram.) (The token for representation.) (The token for tokenization.)

Conservation of the Circle is the only dynamic in Nature. (Why we’re experiencing, and are, all, responsible for, technological (linguistic) chaos.)

The Cryptic Universe: How Technology is Answering Our Deepest Questions about Reality — Kindle edition by Yardley, Ilexa. Politics & Social Sciences Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.

See, also: 1221. There are only two numbers in Nature… | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Medium

Why language ‘works:’ circumference and diameter (zero and one) represent half and whole. Thus, we experience, and we ‘learn to’ navigate, a two-state system, where everything is ‘true’ (and, also, ‘false’) half-the-time because half-the-time, from Nature’s point of view, is all-the-time. Again, refer to the diagram which is how Nature experiences the human’s use of ‘language.’ (Language cannot describe how Nature experiences the human’s use of language.)

--

--