The Key to Complexity
Conservation of a circle.
There is a circular-linear relationship between an individual and a group. And this applies, naturally, to all individuals and groups. Explaining complexity:
That is, an individual is a group, and a group is an individual. Something that has been overlooked, since ancient times.
Meaning, the conservation of a circle explains all individuals and all groups. Removing the whole notion of (or, if you’d rather, explaining) (what humans label) ‘complexity.’
This is because a circle cannot designate between a circumference and a diameter. Meaning the drawing you are carrying around in your head as a circle (technically, a circumference), and the drawing you are carring around in your head as a line (technically a diameter), are, both, incorrect. You need both to have either, so the following is the only possible diagram for a circle (and, also, a line).
You have to understand this, first, if you want to understand behavior in any system: a circle and a line (a circumference and a diameter) (in sexual terms a female and a male) is a self-referential recursion (also known as quantum entanglement). Explaining all behavior. In all systems.
Meaning, the diagram above is Nature. The diagram above is, also, each and every constituent of Nature (no matter how they (and-or ‘it’) are observed, and-or labeled, by humans).
This is because the conservation of a circle is required for observation, turning observers into observations (and observations into observers).
Meaning, pi is the only observer (and, technically, then, the only observation). Explaining why 50–50 is the constant and the norm (according to humans). From Nature’s point of view, no constant, no norm, no humans. No complexity at all. Just the simple conservation of an uber-simple circle. Which humans have overlooked (on purpose, by Nature) (and, perhaps, on purpose, by humans). See: What the Metaverse has to do with Physics | by Ilexa Yardley | The Circular Theory | Oct, 2021 | Medium
Everything about biomemetics… (and decisioning…)
