Two Observers (Not One)

Sep 30, 2019 · 4 min read

Negation is an intelligent form of duplication.

If you say something is ‘not’ you are saying it is, also, not-not. Meaning, if you think about it, just a little, the double negative (also known as the double entendre) articulates ‘reality.’

Two: The Maximum and Minimum Number in Nature

In simpler terms, it is ‘not’ possible to have ‘two’ without ‘one.’ And, always, vice versa. (Meaning ‘two’ is the intelligent person’s way to say ‘one.’)

This explains, and proves, why you always have to have ‘two’ observers in Nature. Think ‘Noah’s arc.’ Literally and figuratively.

This proves the background state for ‘everything’ (and, nothing, if you want to ‘go there…’) is ‘pi.

Pi: The Background State in Nature

Pi in mathematics, then, is what a human labels ‘mind.’

Explaining why whatever we ‘think’ is ‘true,’ is, definitely, true (for ‘us’) (and, at least) (at most) (one other observer).

This explains why we (all of us) have ‘two’ observers within (us). One telling us to do ‘X.’ And the other telling us to do ‘Y.’ Also known as the ‘conscience’ in some versions of ‘reality.’

Circular Relationship: Is What ‘Conserves’ Nature

Meaning, there is a circular relationship between any X and-or Y. Making X and Y possible. And, also, then, probable.

This explains why 50–50 is the base dynamic in Nature. Meaning, Nature doesn’t know the number ‘three.’ And, also, if you want to be clear about it, Nature doesn’t know any numbers.

Explaining the overall ‘function’ of a ‘function.’ Separating, and, also, then, joining, the human ‘numbers,’ one, and, two.

Equality: Is Fiction (and-or ‘Not’) in Nature (Depending on Your Point of View) (Both True)

That is, you cannot have an ‘equal’ sign, without a ‘not-equal’ sign. Meaning, any operation in mathematics articulates an uber-simple circle.

Meaning, negation is, necessarily, an ‘other’ word for duplication.

This explains why ancient ‘thinkers’ recommended detachment. Except, it is not possible to have detachment without ‘attachment.’ Again, they share an uber-simple (always-present) ‘circle.’

Balance: Has to Be Unbalanced Half-the-Time

Therefore, we’re balanced, as we live, all of us, by the ‘two’ observers within.

Which, necessarily, take us ‘out-of-balance’ half-the-time.

Explaining the advice you’re given by ‘others.’ All the time.

Half is Whole (and Always Vice Versa)

Meaning, no matter what we do (or say) (or think) the conservation of a circle keeps us ‘whole.’

And, it’s impossible not to ‘know’ this. Somewhere, deep, within.

Explaining all of the philosophy (and psychology) (from astrology) (to cosmology). Complementarity is the basis for identity. All systems. Go. Or no-go.

Conservation of the circle explains everything (about everything, and, everyone). No matter how you ‘slice’ the ‘dice.’ Two observers. Not-one.

Invest in (or teach) The Circular Theory…

Written by

More From Medium

The ‘Super’ Bowl

Feb 2 · 3 min read

A Social Experiment

Jan 1 · 6 min read

Becoming ‘Realistic’ About General (and Special) Relativity

Dec 7, 2019 · 5 min read

2

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just \$5/month. Upgrade