What a Metaphor Proves
Reality is elegantly unified by an always-present circle.
All of the ‘words’ in any language, including the symbols used in the language of mathematics, are metaphors (and, therefore, ‘a metaphor’) for a circle.
Articulation in General
We can prove this easily. Choose any word (or number). A word (and, also, then, a number, and-or, an algorithm) is a way of articulating a circle. Where the words ‘and’ and ‘or’ are obvious examples.
The diagram proves you cannot have ‘and’ without ‘or,’ and, always, then, vice versa.
The diagram, if you look at it closely, is two different ways of articulating the relationship between ‘diameter’ and ‘circumference.’ The elements of a circle.
Symbolic Representation in General
The diagram is the basis for a metaphor. Language in general (any language, any symbolic representation). That is, the metaphor proves ‘reality’ and, therefore, Nature, is unified (by the conservation of a circle).
Therefore, we know, and we can decide to ‘observe,’ that ancient philosophical systems (religion in general) were based on the conservation of a circle. They all used metaphors to articulate what we know (and use) today as mathematics.
You can see this (or prove it for yourself) using the diagram. Think of any metaphor. The metaphor is an elegant technological algorithm. All metaphors depend on the ‘if, then’ statement.
Conditionality in General
That is ‘if, X, then, Y.’ This is the most general form of a metaphor. And, also, then, logic, mathematics, and technology.
Therefore, it is easy to see, the conditional statement, if-then, is based on the base relationship within the conservation of a circle: if diameter, then circumference. Meaning you cannot have a diameter without a circumference. And, ‘pi,’ then, would have to be the background state for everything.
This explains everything in physics. And, also, everything in philosophy. (Mathematics. Technology.)
