Where a ‘Dictator’ Comes From
The circular relationship between individual and group.
Everybody’s a ‘dictator’ half-the-time. Don’t believe me? Think about it more carefully.
Meaning, there’s a mandatory circular relationship between individual and group. Any individual group. Any individual in a ‘group.’
Where the largest and the smallest group is the number ‘two.’ Two-not-one (two-as-one) (two-is-one) explains both individual, and, group.
Where everybody has ‘two’ (and, only, two) sides.
This explains where the ‘dictator’ comes from. The ‘dictator’ inherits (or takes over) a group. And then he-or-she-or-it deals with the consequences (a dictator cannot control a group).
To diagram this, confidently,
This means a dictator has ‘two’ sides (just like all the rest of us).Nice and mean. That’s all. Where the ‘group,’ also, has ‘two’ sides (nice and mean). Where dictator and group share a mandatory ‘circular’ relationship, forcing 50–50 on both (all) of them.
And this explains everyone (and everything). The conservation of a circle explains the (minimum and maximum) group. Why oppositional dynamics are present in all groups (whether, or not, they are managed, or led, by, a dictator).
Where any authority is the ‘dictator’ in a group. Why all of us are concerned about technological reality, where the ‘robot’ and the ‘algorithm’ becomes the ‘authority’ (dictator) in the ‘group.’
Where technology, robot, and algorithm, have to have a ‘nice’ side, and, always, also, a ‘mean’ side. Explaining everything we are experiencing. Right now.
So, half-the-time we have to worry about this. The other half. Not so much.
