Why Logic Doesn’t Get Us Anywhere

Ilexa Yardley
The Circular Theory
4 min readDec 16, 2018

A simple circle explains (and controls) reality.

Logic. (Alekon Pictures)

Yin and yang is zero and one. And, everybody ‘knows’ this. It explains, perfectly, why ‘logic’ doesn’t get us anywhere.

Yin and yang. Zero and one.

Logic depends on an ‘underlying’ difference between X and-or Y. Which means, we, as humans, are able to ‘separate’ X and-or Y. And, also, and, and-or, or.

X and Y.
X or Y.

This means we (as humans) have to take a deeper look at the word ‘separate.’ Meaning, as we all know, ‘separate’ and ‘join’ are, obviously, X and-or Y. Zero and-or one.

Separate and join (separate or join).
X and-or Y. 0 and-or 1.

This ‘logic’ is ‘held together’ (separated and joined) by the simple observation, zero and one is circumference and diameter. Literally. And, of course, figuratively.

Zero and (or) one. Circumference and (or) diameter.

This means the conservation of a circle is the basis for reality (and Nature) as ‘humans’ ‘know’ it.

Conservation of a circle.

Meaning, you cannot have a circumference without a diameter, making ‘two’ the most basic (maximum and minimum) ‘number’ in Nature. Where the word ‘number’ is an alternate expression for the word ‘symbol.’

Zero and one. One and two.
Nature (reduced and expanded).
Reality (literally and figuratively).

This explains why humans use abstractions in order to ‘understand’ reality (Nature). And, also why, humans can ‘substitute’ one ‘word’ for an ‘other.’

Symbolic reality. Symbolic nature.

It also explains everything in ‘neuroscience’ and ‘genetics,’ since both require simple ‘repetition’ (also symbolized ‘reproduction’).

Neuroscience.
Genetics.
Natural abstraction. (Repetition) (Reproduction)

Meaning the ‘conservation of a circle’ explains why humans use ‘logic’ to articulate ‘reality’ at least, and at most, half-the-time.

Logic. Not-logical.
Complementarity. Identity.

Where any idea (identity) requires complementarity.

Identity. Complementarity.

Where, circling back to the beginning of this article, you cannot have the number ‘one’ without the number ‘two.’ Again, because you cannot have circumference without diameter (zero without one).

Circle back.
Two (not one). Two (as one). Two (is one).

Where the number ‘two’ is, and isn’t, ‘one.’

Is. Is-not.

Again, duplicity is required for negation (identification).

Duplicity. Identity.

So, there it is. Right here. In front of you. For you to ‘see.’ So you can understand why ‘logical’ arguments make sense, at least, and (or), at most, half-the-time.

50–50

Again, where, underneath (and overlying) everything, is a simple circle, that has complete ‘control.’ Meaning, the word ‘pi,’ is the technically correct ‘description’ for, what a human ‘calls,’ ‘mind.’

Mind.

Where an ‘idea’ is a simple ‘abstraction’ of a necessarily ‘concrete’ reality. Where, again, you cannot have one without the ‘other.’

Idea. Reality.
Abstract. Concrete.

Where the only way you can ‘abstract’ reality in a ‘concrete’ way, is to use this diagram (words and numbers will not ‘do’ it).

So, now you know. Conservation of the circle is the core (only) dynamic in Nature.

https://www.amazon.com/Circular-Theory-Ilexa-Yardley-ebook/dp/B0046ZS1KQ

--

--