Why Statistics (Do Not) Matter
50–50 is 50–50–50
We have reached the point, now, through technology, and ‘artificial’ intelligence, where we can extract insights about ‘numbers’ at the ‘deepest’ level.
That is, zero and one is one and two. Meaning, one and two is three and four. Meaning, five is an alternate number for two.
Here is the proof for the preceding paragraph:
There is an obvious circle between any ‘zero’ and ‘one.’ Where zero and one is circumference and diameter. Literally, and, figuratively.
Therefore, the decimal system is neatly divided into ‘two’ by the number ‘five.’ Explaining the deep relationship between binary and decimal (zero and one).
This means five ‘tens’ articulate the numbers ‘two and three.’ Meaning 50–50 is 50–50–50.
Thus, statistics do not matter, since any zero is, half-the-time, a ‘one.’
Meaning, a ‘one’ is a ‘ten,’ (is a ‘thousand’ ‘million’ ‘billion) because a five is the number ‘two.’
Therefore one-two is two-ones. One-three is three-ones. Any number is, realistically, the number ‘two.’ One-zero is zero-one.
Therefore, any ‘symbol’ articulates the number ‘two.’ Because the act of ‘symbolizing’ requires an X and Y (a zero and one, a circumference and diameter). Explaining symbolization in general, and, universally.
Explaining, also, how we get a ‘sequence.’ Which is the basis for ‘counting,’ ‘sets,’ ‘categories.’ Conservation and symmetry. Identity and complementarity.
Which explains the genesis of a ‘unit.’ And, therefore algorithms, algebra, in general. Mathematics, and statistics. Operations on units. Patterns, in general. Mathematics in general.
You will notice, now, any ‘expression,’ mathematical or otherwise, can be attached to this uber-simple ‘diagram.’
Because the diagram articulates, and proves, conservation of the circle is core dynamic in Nature. Meaning the diagram is responsible for everything in Nature. All the ‘nouns’ in Nature. All the ‘verbs’ in Nature.
There is a circular relationship then, between any noun and any other noun. Any verb and any other verb. Any noun and verb. Any X and-or Y.
Explaining all of the ’modifiers’ in Nature. Where all of these ‘words,’ from Nature’s point of view, are the same (in order to be ‘different’).
That is, X and X is, always, also, X and Y.
Where the ‘conjunction’ ‘and’ is, half-the-time, the ‘conjunction’ ‘or.’
Where, again, 50–50, is, always, also, 50–50–50. 1.0 is 1.5 is 0.5. Any set of three (three) articulates the number ‘two’.
Explaining how, and, why we can ‘string’ any set of characters (or numbers). Any set of symbols. Using the basic ‘zero’ with a ‘one.’
Because if zero then one, means if circumference then diameter. Proving all of the above is, necessarily ‘true.’
Where any ‘zero’ and ‘one’ is half-the-time true. Zero is half-the-time one. Eliminating the duplicity we are experiencing in ‘current’ technology. More aptly labeled (extreme) redundancy.
And, paving the way for the ‘next’ (last) generation of ‘technology.’ Which is based on ‘quantum’ relativity. Which is more correctly termed ‘quantum circularity.’ Sometimes labeled ‘quantum entanglement.’
Solving all of our ‘problems’ in cosmology. Streamlining (advancing) our ‘understanding’ of ‘intelligent autonomy.’ Also known as the ‘qubit.’ For software, hardware, electrical engineers, ushering in ‘quantum computing.’
Where, all of us, will have to spend the time it takes, to understand this article. (Read slowly.) If we are to ‘proceed’, and-or negotiate, ‘successfully,’ with an ‘intelligent’ understanding of the ‘reality’ we have, already, ‘created,’ and are, ‘already,’ experiencing.
Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in Nature. Meaning, conservation of the circle is the ‘only’ dynamic in Nature.
Ilexa Yardley is the author and the editor of The Circular Theory.
