Why Theoretical Physicists are Forced to Plagiarize
Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in nature.
A theoretical physicist has a Sisyphean task. Come up with something new. Escape the insipid, jejune, bombastic. Get others to follow, get on board, agree, that you have ‘discovered’ something new.
So, he-and-or-she is forced to plagiarize.
Why?
There is nothing ‘new’ in theoretical physics.
Every ‘new’ advancement in ‘understanding’ is the same old understanding clothed in different (supposedly new) words.
Why? (And, or, more to the point, how?)
Subject and object (true and false) share an uber-basic-and-therefore-a-necessarily-ubiquitous circle.
Proving:
Conservation of the circle is the core dynamic in nature (anything theoretical is, necessarily, real). Every theoretical physicist articulates the exact same reality (no matter what symbols he-or-she uses). You cannot have true without false (and vice versa). Algorithms and algebra prove the conservation of a circle (nothing ‘more’ or ‘less’).
