Judge Sets Trial For RICO Case Against The Clintons

by Brandon Neilan

The same Federal law that has charged 14 FIFA officials on racketeering charges is now being mustered against the Clintons amid the Clinton Foundation’s many scandals that have conjured up in the past few months.

Judge Donald Middlebrooks of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida has ordered the hearing.

Larry Klayman of Freedom watch is the one that brought about the charges concerning the Clintons.

RICO (The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) was enacted by the 91st United States Congress back in 1970 during The Reagan Administration to cease and desist all possible racketeering activities — even hitting top leadership that were involved in those said activities — making it possible for criminal, scandalous politicians, and others of the sort that gave an order, but not directly involved, the ability to be charged — fined up to $25,000, and a maximum prison sentence of 20+ years per each individual count of racketeering.

Most discerning is the fact he’s focusing on Hillary Clinton’s emails, citing FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) fraud, suggesting the Clintons participated in heinous acts of not providing needed information to Mr. Klayman.

The full constituent of the public law that was enacted on October 15, 1970 can be seen (below).

Judge Middlebrooks has set a trial date for the Clintons on January 20, 2016 of next year in Florida, right before the Iowa Caucuses on February 1st and New Hampshire Primary on February 9th. 2 weeks have been set aside in the courtroom — a pivotal time in the election campaigning timeline that will surely draw some questions around her campaigning for the 2016 elections taking place later next year, on November 8, 2016.

Will this draw Hillary’s campaigning to a close, or will she continue with her elaborate clause of outstanding vilified and scandal riddled Clinton Foundation funding. Maintaining that the $600,000 salary by NBC was needed for her daughter, (Chelsea left her NBC post back in 2014)— and that taking outrageous contributions for herself and Bill are needed, when the foundation itself was originally intended to provide as such, a charitable organization.

Will misappropriated funds be found to ascertain and discern the findings of such an organization?

The Clinton Foundation, which has taken at least $10 million from Saudi princes and the like since 2001, shows a lack of transparency in where the fiscal information attributing to their foundation is.

And in an act much like that out of a Mafia movie — RICO now has mounted filings of racketeering and fraud charges plaquing their money making foundation — that seems to be less of a charitable organization and more of a rused donation channel, benefiting the Clinton’s and their 5 star lavish lifestyle.

Most people let into the matter and make statements like this will never happen. The thing that makes these charges so significant is that an actual date by a judge has been set, prosecuting and defending attorneys have been picked — RICO, a law that has castigated Frank Tieri( crime boss and first RICO case, convicted), The Gambino Crime Family (found guilty, life in prison), Catholic Bishops (for sex abuse, but cleared), and the most recent case, that of the 14 FIFA officials and members and their 47 count indictment (a 24 year scheme to enrich those 14 defendants with millions and millions of dollars in part, due to wire fraud and racketeering, which is still ongoing) (below)— citizens must see that this isn't just a slap on the wrist or a ploy.

Now, the Clintons are being indicted on the same charges that Mafia bosses, crime families, and scandalized pro sports officials have been in the past and present — in formal arbitrational setting.

But Klayman is not necessarily going after their foundation. No, instead he is going after Hillary Clinton’s emails and her involvement in the releasing of Israeli war and cyber-warfare documents, plans, and processes.

WND reported on Klayman’s statement:

Hillary Clinton orchestrated this release to harm and thwart Israeli plans to preemptively attack Iranian nuclear sites to stop the Islamic nation’s march to producing atomic weapons, according to Klayman.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/judge-sets-trial-for-rico-claims-against-clintons/#VAU4P7tZUHvWrqFw.99

If proven true this would make the U.S. Obama Administration’s already volatile relationship with Israel even that more rocky.

Other items to be looked at in the court proceedings are the predominant mainstream media watched ‘personal servers’ of which Hillary kept her personal and work email domains registered on and corresponded using her personal email address and server while serving as Secretary of State.

The claim also accuses Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills on lying about the existence of the FOIA documents Klayman requested.

Klayman originally filed this suit to quote: make sure material evidence was not lost or subjugated on her personal email servers.

The complaint also leads to the amassed fortune that the Clinton’s have racked up since 2000, and especially in the last 10 years in which the Clintons have made over $100 Million, despite repeatedly saying they were broke. Evidence suggests that Hillary on average makes $250,000 per speech and Bill $500,000 a speech. Outside of the Clinton Foundation, $105 million in personal funds have been found.

The (below) is the financial and earning reports for the Clinton Foundation (2013).

While directed as a non-profit, there is too much evidence to suggest that the restricted and unrestricted costs associated with the said report might indeed be salaried cost or annuities dedicated to Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea.

2013 records state $65,775,050 is the total amount dedicated to salaries and benefits minus general expenditures which are totaled thereafter, but $9,592,297 made out to the management and general staff — so assuming the other amount goes to the other salaried staff minus the Clinton family — that’s still quite a bit of money. Non-profit executive directors and above generally make a fair amount, but also seem to be more transparent than the Clinton family.

Seeing as this report was written on 11–19–14, I would assume that we won't be able to compile 2014's report until the latter part of this year, and 2015 the next year respectively.

Klayman also filed suit stating that the email servers were likely concealed due to the arranging of funds, donations and large sums of cash being annotated for speaking events amongst other fund raising campaigns.

The other issue that may be looked at is the Clinton Foundation’s relationship with the State Department.

Other items that could possibly be investigated include Uranium One — which New York Times did an exposé back on April 23, 2015, (below).

The Clinton Foundation does, indeed, have a very large list of donors ranging from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to Rupert Murdoch (owner of the News Corp Foundation).

At times like these when transparency is a must for all politicians (no more swindling, corruption, or racketeering for your own financial means is needed) non-profit groups, their leaders, and their foundations should be charged heavily if found to obstruct justice and falter on their conceived original motives.

This is why RICO was written, this is why Klayman has brought the facts, wants answers, and why Judge Middlebrook has brought the case to procession.

People of America want transparent politicians, facts, apparent interest in the people, and a loathing of non-facts to disappear and append to the citizens.

If RICO successfully indicts the Clintons, the ability to get other politicians on the shelf and brought to justice, might be just.

More to come as the facts pour out about the hearing and how it will affect the Clinton campaign of 2016.