Member-only story
When the Audience Changes, So Does the Science
How Chris Wright rewrites energy reality to suit the room
Chris Wright, the newly appointed U.S. Secretary of Energy, has wasted no time in making his stance on energy policy clear. In his first major international speech at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) Conference in London, he framed net-zero as an economic disaster and defended fossil fuel expansion. But just a few weeks later, at CERAWeek 2025 in Houston, his message shifted — he abandoned political arguments and instead leaned into misleading technical claims, asserting that renewables were physically incapable of replacing fossil fuels.
This rhetorical evolution — from attacking net-zero as bad policy to arguing that clean energy is technologically impossible — reveals the deeper strategy behind Wright’s messaging. He isn’t making an honest case for energy security; he’s shaping his arguments to fit his audience. At ARC, speaking to politicians and activists, he attacked climate policy. At CERAWeek, speaking to industry executives, he attacked climate physics.
The contradictions expose the fundamental weakness of his position — if his arguments were grounded in reality, he wouldn’t need to change them depending on who was listening.
