Silent Oppressors

Elizabeth Anderson’s observations in “Liberty, Equality, and Private Government” shed light on a complex part of modern employment contracts that has significant impacts on individual liberty. The inclusion of non-compete agreements as modern tools similar to past forms of enslavement is particularly thought-provoking. Anderson argues that, in a society that has seemingly abolished obvious forms of “bondage and peonage,” a more concealed yet common system of control survives in contractual barriers to exit. The comparison between historical slavery and current noncompete clauses highlights the growth of ways by which employers exercise control over their employees. The change from physical confinement to restrictions on working freedom demonstrates the wide range of power systems. It provokes reflection on the meaning of freedom in contractual partnerships, challenging the idea that the lack of clear slavery signifies to true freedom. Additionally, the phrase “imprison workers’ human capital” conveys the essence of today’s job issue. It brings up images of mental and skill-based captivity, where contractual restrictions limit individuals’ professional advancement. This idea promotes discussion on the balance between company interests and individual freedom, emphasizing ethical concerns about contractual arrangements that limit workers’ ability to utilize and develop their skills fully.In summary, Anderson’s knowledge incites thought about the changing nature of control in the employer-employee dynamic and the impact of contractual limits on individual freedom. It stresses the importance of an in-depth examination of modern work practices and how they align with the values of equality and freedom.