The India Notes
Published in

The India Notes

Why does a salary cut hurt more than the joy of a bonus?

A short note loss aversion in behavioral economics

The following questions presented to two different groups of subjects, and they were asked to choose an option.

In problem 2, the (probable) pain of losing the $200 is less than the pain of losing the $100 (for sure). People chose the risk of losing more to have got a chance of no loss at all.

In behavioural economics, this phenomenon is called loss-aversion.

We all hate losses, but loss aversion states that the perceived value of a loss is higher than an equivalent gain. This is why a salary cut hurts us more than the joy of a year-end bonus. We evaluate losses and gains differently.

Individuals also think about losses and gains relative to their current wealth.

Our happiness increases as we get wealthier, but at a decreasing rate (i.e.), as we grow rich, the impact of an additional 1 Lakh in your bank account significantly decreases.

For a daily wage worker, an additional 1 Lakh rupees would be a life-changing event. The reverse of this also true. A loss of 1 Lakh rupees could potentially push them below the poverty line. Still, for a wealthy person, it is either negligible or manageable.

For a developing country like India, loss aversion becomes the basis of how individuals make a financial decision. One wrong decision could potentially erase your wealth and push you below the poverty line (BPL).

This explains why 86% of India’s wealth is in physical assets (Real estate and gold), where the perceived loss over a long term period is zero and low probability of capital erosion.

As financial services become digital (faceless), it becomes essential to be cognizant of the choice architecture presented in our apps. The hierarchy of options and the language of explanation shown to the users might have long term effects on their life.

‘Should we be showing the high-risk mutual fund even though you know that they might not be able to liquidate it in the short term?’

‘Should we be lending instant loans without explaining the consequences of potentially getting into a debt trap?’

Food for thought

Personal takeaway: As we earn more money, the increment in happiness reduces with more wealth added. At some point, we will have to change our definition of a happy life.

References:

--

--

--

The India notes documents insights around behaviours and aspirations of Indians. My goal is to share powerful narratives that nudge creators to build culturally appropriated products for digital India. Curated and penned by Dharmesh Ba.

Recommended from Medium

What happened on Jan 26? and what’s going to happen in the months to come?

Why Predatory Capitalism Failed (as a Way to Organize a Global Economy)

ANALYSIS: Thank Dairy for $64 Billion in Tax Revenue

Is The Value Premium Smaller Than We Thought?

Is The Value Premium Smaller Than We Thought?

Spanish Social Venture Market Analysis

Let the Market Build EV Charging Stations

Jeff Brown’s Latest Prediction On Stock Markets: The Second Wave

Hacking ‘factors of productions’ — an offbeat economic analogy

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Dharmesh Ba

Dharmesh Ba

Building @D91Labs, Design lead @setu. NID alumnus, ex-Cleartax. All things fintech.

More from Medium

How Cities Can Be Product-Driven

2021: Look back to look forward:2022

Gen Z Leader: Brandon Goh from Tesla

What kind of Leader are you?