Tim Walz vs JD Vance. Who Is The Better Vice President For The Future Of The USA?
--
Which right hand man is better for office?
As the 2024 election approaches, attention has not only been on the presidential candidates but also on their vice-presidential picks: J.D. Vance for Donald Trump and Tim Walz for Kamala Harris. Both VPs bring unique backgrounds and policies to the table, which voters should consider as they weigh their options. Here’s an overview of what Vance and Walz might bring to the administration if elected.
J.D. Vance’s Vision as Trump’s Running Mate
J.D. Vance, known for his memoir Hillbilly Elegy, brings a populist and economic-focused perspective to the ticket. He grew up in a working-class family and has positioned himself as an advocate for rural America, which he feels has been neglected by political elites. His views reflect this populism:
- Economy and Trade: Vance is critical of current economic policies, emphasizing the need to rebuild American manufacturing and cut reliance on global supply chains, particularly with China. He aligns with Trump on pursuing trade policies that favor American workers and reducing globalization’s influence on the economy.
- Cultural and Social Issues: Vance has spoken about the social decline of rural communities and has advocated for policies to restore American families and traditional values. His focus on “family” as a core policy has led him to support conservative stances on issues like abortion and religious freedom.
- Foreign Policy: Much like Trump, Vance is skeptical of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and believes in prioritizing national interests. He has expressed disdain for the foreign policy establishment, especially with regard to military interventions in places like Iraq, based on his experience as a Marine(
Vance’s background as a venture capitalist and his harsh criticism of the elite class positions him as a figure focused on economic rejuvenation and working-class priorities.
Tim Walz’s Approach as Harris’s Running Mate
Tim Walz, governor of Minnesota and former U.S. congressman, brings a more progressive but pragmatic approach to the Harris ticket. His background as a teacher and veteran informs much of his policy focus:
- Healthcare: Walz has been an advocate for expanding access to healthcare, particularly through public options. He supports strengthening the Affordable Care Act, making healthcare more accessible to rural and low-income communities, reflecting Harris’s vision for expanding healthcare coverage(
- Climate Change: As governor, Walz has championed renewable energy initiatives and has worked to make Minnesota a leader in combating climate change. He supports Harris’s climate agenda, focusing on reducing emissions and creating green jobs to transition the U.S. towards a sustainable energy future(
- Social Justice and Equality: Walz has worked on policies aimed at addressing racial inequality, particularly in the wake of George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis. He’s a strong advocate for criminal justice reform, police accountability, and expanding civil rights protections. This aligns with Harris’s progressive stance on these issues(
Walz also emphasizes collaboration and bipartisanship, appealing to moderate and independent voters who are concerned about the increasing polarization in politics. His leadership style contrasts with Vance’s more confrontational populism.
Key Differences and What They Mean for Voters
Economy:
Vance advocates for protectionist economic policies, aligning with Trump’s “America First” platform.
Walz supports government intervention to promote equality and social welfare, particularly in healthcare and climate change.
Leadership Style:
Vance embraces a populist, anti-establishment approach, particularly focused on the struggles of rural America.
In contrast, Walz brings a collaborative and bipartisan record, emphasizing social justice and progressive reforms.
Social Issues:
Vance’s focuses on traditional family values and opposition to progressive social policies.
Walz’s on the other hand, is supportive of racial justice, LGBTQ+ rights, and expanded healthcare.
In the context of the 2024 election, voters who are drawn to Trump’s nationalist and economic platform might find Vance’s advocacy for rural America and traditional values appealing. On the other hand, those who are concerned with healthcare, climate change, and social justice may see Walz as a compelling complement to Harris’s progressive agenda.
Ultimately, choosing between the two VPs may come down to how voters prioritize issues like the economy, social justice, healthcare, and national security, as well as the leadership styles they believe are best suited to guide the country forward.
Thank You for reading this article! I believe when discussing the presidential election, the Vice Presidents in both parties often get overlooked and are not taken into account. I tried my best to shed light on the two candidate’s running mates, and hope I was successful in doing so.
Check out my other articles if you like reading this one!
Sources used:
- Politico — Detailed background on J.D. Vance, including his views on economic and social policies, as well as his history as an author and political figure:
- 55 Things to Know About JD Vance(
- POLITICO
2. Tim Walz’s Official Governor Page — This page highlights his initiatives in Minnesota, particularly in healthcare, climate change, and social justice reforms:
- Tim Walz — Governor of Minnesota(
- POLITICO
