Coronavirus. A medical professional would know how the meaning of this word has changed drastically in the past 3 months. From being the virus that causes ‘common cold’, to today- where it has killed over 13000 people worldwide, and it’s just getting started. The novel coronavirus (2019-nCov or SARS-CoV2) is the latest from the family of viruses known as ‘coronaviridae’. This family is notorious for causing respiratory disease outbreaks, second only to the Influenza family of viruses.
India. A country of 1.34 billion (134 crore), with much of this population living in poor hygiene and clustered environments. Developed countries like Italy and US are struggling to meet the healthcare demands coronavirus has produced. Needless to say, the health system of India is grossly under-equipped to handle a blow of the same magnitude.
Mix these two. It is a recipe for disaster. Let us see how.
If you are not a medical professional, you can ignore the jargon in between. I will go on to explain everything in simplified terms.
India cases and fatality forecast through predictive modelling
Epidemics grow exponentially, not linearly. Most of you would already know this. But even then, many of us will be surprised when we see the increasing number of daily new cases a week from now. That is, the human mind does not comprehend exponential growth very well. To make more sense of what we should expect in the coming weeks-months, let us take a look at a mathematical model of the same. The model used here is the SEIR model, which has been used to accurately predict previous outbreaks like SARS.
Before we start predicting stuff, we need to know the input parameters first- the stats we feed into the model. The first one is R0 (R-naught) also called the Basic Reproduction Number. It is essentially the number of new cases a single infected person will cause during their infectious period. It is one of the most important parameters for assessing any epidemic- it indicates how contagious the virus is. Coronavirus has an R0~2.4. In contrast, the H1N1 virus had an R0~1.5 in the 2009 swine flu epidemic. The R0 will inform us about how many people will get infected.
The second one is the Case Fatality Rate (CFR), which is the percentage of infected people that will die due to the infection. The CFR for coronavirus has been reported between 0.5–4%. The higher values are more appropriate in resource poor settings where the quality of hospital and intensive care might be constrained(developing countries), or in places where the epidemic caused a sudden surge in the number of cases requiring critical care which overwhelmed the otherwise sufficient healthcare system (developed countries like Italy and USA). To achieve the lower end of CFR, early and definitive intervention to prevent the sudden surge is needed, as seen in areas of China outside Hubei (origin of the epidemic) and in South Korea, both of which saw a CFR ~1%. The CFR will inform us about how many people will die.
I must stress that estimations of an ongoing epidemic are only rough estimations, as we still don’t know the definite parameters of this viral disease. The point here is not to give you pinpoint numbers, but to put in context the magnitude of the problem we face and how different steps we take can bring a change in those numbers.
[Update] The references for the parameters used has been provided at the end of the article.
This is what happens if no interventions are done to control coronavirus spread, ie, the worst case scenario for India. About 115,00,00,000 (115 crore) people are infected in total, which is about 85% of India’s population. In the process, the health system is overwhelmed and people lose their lives en-masse: total deaths ~ 4,50,00,000 (4.5 crore). This happens across a span of about 6 months, assuming a hypothetical scenario where no interventions are done at all and the disease is allowed to spread freely.
This is what we see if we intervene today (assuming a strong suppression intervention). Kindly notice the y axis scale has changed from millions in the previous graph to thousands in this one. A total of 13,000 cases and 300 deaths. We talked about how epidemics grow exponentially. Now we know how they die exponentially too.
As of writing this article, the confirmed cases in India stood at 344 with 7 deaths. You must understand the difference between true cases and confirmed/official cases. Say a person gets exposed on Day 1. He develops symptoms on Day 6 (mean incubation period is 5 days). He seeks care on Day 8 (this can be reduced with public awareness about symptoms). His results come back positive on Day 10. So the number of confirmed cases you see in the news on Day 10, those many cases actually existed 5 days ago when the person developed symptoms. This is complicated further by the uncertainty whether Covid patients can be infectious even before they are symptomatic. Let us stick to the simplified model for now. We may conclude that confirmed cases lag the true cases by about a week. The numbers we are seeing today are actually atleast a week old.
How do we know the true cases as of today? There is no certain way to know, though there are some models that can estimate the same. Based upon those, let us assume that the actual number of cases today is about 10 times the confirmed cases. So that is about 350x10=3500 true cases as of today in India, which is the day I chose as the intervention day(=today) in the above graph.
In addition to this, the magnitude of difference between true and confirmed cases depends on the rate of testing. India has not tested aggressively for coronavirus till now (Fig 3), and that means that the true cases may well be greater than estimated above, something to the tune of about 10x to 30x the confirmed cases. This is also suggested by new cases showing up with no contact or travel history, indicating that community transmission is already underway.
This is the scenario if we intervene after 10 days. We see about 50,000 cases and 1000 deaths during the entire outbreak, about a 3–4 fold increase for a 10 day delay in intervention. Realistically, India will be somewhere between these two scenarios (Graph 2 and 3), so we can expect about 13,000–50,000 total cases, and 300–1000 deaths.
By now, every one of us will agree on atleast one thing. We need to intervene, sooner rather than later.
The Indian scenario: reds and greens
Demography: A large percentage of India’s population lives in states with population density as high as 800 people per square kilometer- a fertile soil which will exponentially increase the speed of spread. The social distancing measures we all talk about may be possible for us to implement, but for homes in which 5 people have to sleep in one room, that is not feasible.
Healthcare system capacity: Majority of deaths due to coronavirus have been attributed not to the inherent severity of the disease, but to the sudden increase in number of patients requiring hospitalization, many folds higher than the number of hospital beds available. India has 7,00,000 hospital beds and 70,000 ICU beds. Hospital beds per 1000 people is 0.7 in India, 2.9 in USA, 3.4 in Italy (World Bank). Considering Italy has already been overwhelmed and US is on its way to the same, it is hard to imagine the degree to which India’s hospitals will be crushed if this crisis grows to epidemic proportions.
Healthcare system accessibility: There is another problem with healthcare in India, the huge rural-urban divide (Figure 1). Since this is an imported virus, most urban cities where travellers arrived were affected first, and then went on to spread centrifugally, ie, the pattern of spread is urban to rural. If we can arrest this spread by timely intervention, this factor would play a smaller role.
Demography, again: The proportion of people above 65 years old to the total population is 6% in India, 16% in USA, and 22% in Italy. India is a young country, about half of India’s population is below 21. China saw 80,000 cases with 3,200 deaths, whereas Italy has seen 60,000 cases and 5,400 deaths- almost double the fatality rate. Since most of the mortality of coronavirus is in elderly or older people with pre-existing diseases, this factor is encouraging for India.
India is a late bloomer for coronavirus: We have already seen lots of countries trying to tackle this crisis, each in their own way. Some of them were able to contain it (China except Hubei, South Korea), while others faced disasters of epic proportions (Italy, Germany, US). It is only now, that India’s time has come, and we have the opportunity to act pro-actively rather than re-actively.
How do we intervene?
This is a whole topic in itself, including travel restrictions, social distancing, lockdown, and extensive contact tracing and testing. I will talk about the peculiarities of interventions with regard to India.
Starting with the “janata curfew” or “people’s curfew” on Sunday, about 80 districts across India have now been locked down except essential services. All international travel has been halted and Indian railways which carries over 23 million passengers daily is now shut. All inter state travel has also been shut down. It is widely expected that almost all of India will go in lockdown in the coming few days- the biggest quarantine ever in human history. This may seem draconian to some, but it is essential. Such measures widely break the chain of transmission and isolate existing chains. They also lead to cluster containment- ie, with no interstate movement, each state will behave as an independent cluster in epidemiological terms. This prevents seeding of disease into untouched/less affected states and more effective contact tracing in affected states. This approach can only be successful if each state takes responsibility for it’s own people. It is time for all of us to come at peace with the fact — we will all be under quarantine very soon, for the greater good.
This move comes in a very timely manner in India. Let me show you why. Look at this table carefully-
Wuhan, the origin of COVID19, is the capital of the Chinese province of Hubei. Daily new cases started decreasing about 2 weeks after the lockdown. Hubei is already in the phase of slowly lifting most of the restrictions. The lockdown lasted for 2 months, they got it under control. What remains to be seen is how they progress from here, as history shows that lifting restrictions may lead to a second wave of disease.
As for Italy, the situation is very grim with daily cases and deaths still on the rise. Italy currently has about 800 daily deaths, more than were ever reported in China. My wishes are with the Italians, but they have shown us exactly what not to do. I would expect the daily new cases to start decreasing in Italy within the next few days- I have discussed this later.
US is not very far behind. Infact with 6000 new cases in a day, US overtook Italy in the maximum number of new cases in a day.
The TIMING of quarantine and lockdown measures is of paramount importance! India has partially locked down as of now with 350 confirmed cases. India must ensure this is implemented widely across the country as soon as possible. And this must be continued for now, I hope you see why.
Only lockdown is not enough!
Say you have a confirmed case- Mr X. First you quarantine Mr X. You then trace all the people Mr X has been in contact with since onset of infectious period, reach out to them and place them under quarantine. In a slightly more aggressive strategy, you go ahead and test these contacts even if they don’t show symptoms (India is doing this now). By doing so and following up until all people in this chain either recover or are asymptomatic for 14 days, you end this particular chain of transmission originating from Mr X. Now you got to do this for all the existing chains! It is a huge task, but not an impossible one. We can learn from Kerala with their extraordinary track record in contact tracing.
Dr Mike Ryan from WHO said: “The danger right now with the lockdowns … if we don’t put in place the strong public health measures now, when those movement restrictions and lockdowns are lifted, the danger is the disease will jump back up. What we really need to focus on is finding those who are sick, those who have the virus, and isolate them, find their contacts and isolate them.” Lockdown will prevent new chains of transmission from forming, but the virus still proliferates in existing chains. These existing chains need to be identified. How? By extensive contact tracing, testing and isolation. It is only a combination of these two that will result in an effective suppression response.
As the outbreak progresses, more and more chains of transmission are formed with each branching point. The earlier you do the lockdown, the fewer chains you need to track down and isolate. Here we have another reason for why early intervention is beneficial. Timely lockdowns are more effective, and they last for shorter periods of time. The earlier we enforce it, we earlier we can start lifting it, the earlier the people and economy can start to recuperate.
If you are careless and let the outbreak reach Phase IV- widespread community transmission, you can no longer discern where the cases originate from. It becomes a huge interconnected web and you can no longer effectively do contact tracing. This is where New York is right now- they have asked people not to get tested because they don’t have enough equipment for doing those huge number of tests. Testing in New York is now reserved for healthcare professionals, hospitalised patients, and high risk symptomatic people. Alas, but at this point you can only sit tight and brace for impact.
When do we see the effect of these interventions?
Let us assume we enforce lockdown on Day 1. This has an immediate effect of cutting down exposure of infected people to healthy people. Since the mean incubation period is 5 days (range 4–14 days), daily new symptomatic patients will start decreasing from Day 6 (new patients who are symptomatic from Day 1 to Day 5 have actually been infected before the lockdown). The patient soon seeks care and is diagnosed as a confirmed case. All these steps take time and so the effect is not immediately visible. It has been seen in the case of China, that it takes about 10–14 days after lockdown enforcement for the effect to show.
We should expect a drastic increase in new cases and fatalities in India for the next couple of weeks (atleast for 10 days), thanks to expected exponential phase and expanded testing criteria. It is important not to be discouraged by this finding. With India already at the brim of ICU bed occupancy, many of our hospitals will be overburdened. Due to the chronic under-funding of healthcare in India, we need to ensure some stop-gap measures immediately. The government needs to make sure we acquire enough PPE (personal protective equipment), add extra bed capacity by repurposing beds and creating new facilities, and acquire ventilators- fast!
As Tomas Pueyo writes in his enlightening analysis, time is the most valuable thing we stand to gain from a lockdown. The time to learn more about what we are facing, the time to do research on medicines and vaccines, the time to prepare our infrastructure for any impending attack. It’s like holding the enemy at bay, while we prepare our defenses and send our spies to know thy secrets. The enemy also starts to die down by itself in the meantime due to dwindling supplies.
Looking for the right numbers to see this effect:
An exponential growth curve which eventually flattens out is called a logistic curve (Fig 4 left). The slope of this graph at any given time shows the rate of increase of cases over time ~ number of daily new cases. The inflection point is the point at which the slope first starts decreasing/flattening out. How do we know we have reached the inflection? By keeping an eye on the daily new cases. When you see new cases for a day are less than the new cases on the previous day, you know you’re there. The absolute number of cases will still increase after this, but the rate of increase slows down, and that is the first indication that we are starting to get a hold of the outbreak.
You can see a peculiar similarity between the two graphs (Fig 4left and right), one hypothetical and the other real. It’s almost stunning how maths can approximate reality to such a degree of accuracy. China showed its inflection point on Feb 5, which was 13 days after lockdown (Fig 4 right), and is now on the terminal flat part of the curve. US and Italy entered exponential growth earlier (Fig 5 left), and are now in the relatively linear part of the growth curve. I expect Italy to hit inflection soon (how to predict this here). India has just started on the exponential growth phase (Fig 5 right), and will take quite some time to reach inflection.
Conclusion: What India needs to do right now
~Enforce wide and definitive lockdown measures for atleast 2–4 weeks.
~Expect and prepare for drastic increase in cases for the next 2 weeks. Acquire additional health system capacity for the same.
~Effective isolation of patients, contact tracing and quarantine measures. Ramp up testing.
~Elderly (above 65 years) to be protected more vigorously. Save the old from the young.
~Fast-track indigenous vaccine development so that we can prevent a second wave later.
~Provide social security to people who are affected most during the lockdown- mostly daily wage workers.
We should not expect the government to do all of this. It is our collective civic duty to adhere to public health guidelines and help out in whatever way we can. It may be difficult for us in India, who are unknown to the concept of mass lockdown, to comprehend what is happening. But we need to know why this is happening and accept the fact that it is. The policy-makers (government) and the policy-takers (public) need to step up to this challenge together. India can do this!
We can either make this an opportunity to transform our healthcare and outbreak response strategy into a robust one, or let it break through the very backbone of our nation.
A staggering number of people still don’t understand what we are going through. If you think other people need to know more about this, go ahead and share this with your friends. With most of us on lockdown, they would appreciate something to kill(?) their time. If you would like to add something to what I’ve written, or disagree with some part of it, feel free to leave a response below and I will be happy to respond.
I’ll leave you with this-
You can contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org for queries/discussions/collabs.
Coronavirus: The Hammer and the Dance — by Tomas Pueyo (excellent read)
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 — genomic analysis to determine origins of this novel virus. Also answers whether it was genetically engineered or not.
Exponential growth and epidemics — by 3blue1brown
Predicting impact of public health measures on COVID mortality and healthcare demand — by Imperial College London
Coronavirus India case tracker — by CovidOut
Only references for the epidemiological and clinical parameters used in predictive modeling are listed here. Other references are provided with the respective data in the main text.