Chris Maldonado: Hero or Fool?

Laci Green’s new boyfriend rushes in where angels fear to tread

“A lot of social justice people and a lot of feminists are ostracizing her and putting her on blast, and a lot of anti-feminists and anti-social-justice type people are embracing her with open arms. Now, this is fascinating, because this is usually the exact opposite of how things normally go in this sphere of YouTube.”
 —Chris Maldonado, “Laci Green vs. Feminism?”

Last month, I asked: “Is Laci Green the Anti-Christ?” The occasion for that question was the “sex-positive” feminist’s gestures of accommodation toward so-called “Red Pill” anti-feminists. The cause of this unfathomable development? Evidently, Ms. Green is now dating Chris Maldonado, a popular young YouTuber and critic of SJWs (“Social Justice Warriors”) known online as Chris Ray Gun. Is this “RoMRAeo and SJWuliet”?

Chris Maldonado and Laci Green: Straining the limits of romantic credibility.

To quote Public Enemy: Don’t believe the hype. If something seems too good to be true, it’s probably either (a) not true, or (b) not actually good.

Quos deus perdere vult, dementat prius.

Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad, and what infernal madness could inspire anyone to imagine that Laci Green — a San Francisco Democrat who has been on the payroll of Planned Parenthood since 2012 — has abandoned the feminist death cult for the sake of love? Does anyone really believe that a “pansexual” pro-abortion fanatic like Laci Green, who has spent her entire adult life promoting evil, is suddenly going to repent her sins because she hooked up with a 24-year-old YouTuber? Are we to expect this couple to marry, live happily ever and spawn a Duggar-size brood?

Laci Green is a pro-abortion Democrat who hates “white America.”

If I were asked to wager on the outcome of this alleged “romance,” I’d bet $20 that Chris Maldonado is being duped by a shrewd false-flag operation.

Never underestimate evil. Do not suppose that your enemy is stupid, nor should you think yourself so clever that you cannot be deceived.

However much we might want to believe that someone like Laci Green could be persuaded of her errors, such reversals are exceedingly rare. She is not merely an employee of Planned Parenthood, but an avowed atheist who accuses Christians of killing “billions of innocent people.” Her entire public life has been devoted to this satanic agenda, and when the Devil’s buying souls, he doesn’t offer any short-term free-agent contracts.

NEVER TALK TO A FEMINIST. How many times must I repeat this?

The First Rule of Feminism is SHUT UP! . . .
Men have no right to speak
about feminism. Men have no right to speak to a feminist. Men have no rights at all, according to feminists.
This is what feminism looks like.

Feminist theory is very simple: Men are the enemy, the agents of patriarchal oppression, and no feminist can ever collaborate with the enemy.

“Women are an oppressed class. Our oppression is total, affecting every facet of our lives. . . .
“We identify the agents of our oppression as men. . . . All men receive economic, sexual, and psychological benefits from male supremacy. All men have oppressed women.”
 — Redstockings, “Manifesto,” 1969
“We are angry because we are oppressed by male supremacy. We have been f–ked over all our lives by a system which is based on the domination of men over women.”
 — Ginny Berson, “The Furies,” 1972
“Men are the enemy. Heterosexual women are collaborators with the enemy. . . .
“We see heterosexuality as an institution of male domination, not a free expression of personal preference.”
 — Leeds Revolutionary Feminists, 1981
“It is the system of heterosexuality that characterises the oppression of women and gives it a different shape from other forms of exploitative oppression. . . .
“Sex roles originate from heterosexuality. . . . Sex roles must be created so that no human being of either gender is fully capable of independent functioning and heterosexual coupling then seems natural and inevitable.”
 — Sheila Jeffreys, Anticlimax: A Feminist Perspective on the Sexual Revolution (1990)
“Men affirm male superiority through use of the penis as a weapon against the female. . . .
“Because men want women’s sexual services for themselves only . . . men make women’s heterosexuality compulsory.”
 — Dee Graham, et al., Loving to Survive: Sexual Terror, Men’s Violence, and Women’s Lives (1994)
“From the beginning of second-wave feminism, sexuality was identified as a key site of patriarchal domination and women’s resistance to it. . . .
“While heterosexual desires, practices, and relations are socially defined as ‘normal’ and normative, serving to marginalize other sexualities as abnormal and deviant, the coercive power of compulsory heterosexuality derives from its institutionalization as more than merely a sexual relation.”
 — Stevi Jackson, “Sexuality, Heterosexuality, and Gender Hierarchy: Getting Our Priorities Straight,” in Thinking Straight: The Power, the Promise, and the Paradox of Heterosexuality, edited by Chrys Ingraham (2005)
“One of patriarchy’s most successful strategies for controlling women’s bodies is to pose heterosexuality as the default sexuality, to funnel women into straightness and punish deviance from heteronormativity. Men in heterosexual relationships benefit from access to women’s bodies, labour, and emotional support.”
 — Jocelyn MacDonald, “Today’s shameless lesbians won’t be queered,” Jan. 13, 2017
“What these male feminists fail to realize is that, as men, they will always be oppressors. . . . Feminism does not need men. . . . Feminism is not supposed to be palatable to men; it is supposed to be threatening.”
 — Nian Hu, “Beware the Male Feminist,” March 23, 2017

Feminism has always has been an anti-male hate movement. Nothing a man might say in his own defense has any validity to a feminist. To be male is to be wrong, according to feminist theory. NEVER TALK TO A FEMINIST:

Guys: Learn to take a hint. Learn to walk away.
If a woman tells you she is a feminist, say nothing and walk away.
No feminist wants to hear what a man has to say, and life is too short to waste your time taking to feminists. Just walk away.
Leave feminists alone, and then they can complain about that.

What, then, are we to make of Laci Green’s apparent apostasy? Are we to suppose she has had a road-to-Damascus experience, and suddenly realized that feminist ideology is wrong? Has she repudiated Planned Parenthood’s radical agenda? Could it be that Chris Maldonado is such a persuasive agent of “patriarchal domination” that Ms. Green has abandoned her feminism and succumbed to “the coercive power of compulsory heterosexuality”?

In a 2014 video, Laci Green denounced masculinity as “sexist,” a source of “exclusion and unequal power in society.” It is wrong for men to be masculine, she explained, because masculinity makes men “emotionally stunted.” Male heterosexuality is also wrong, she said, because this is about men “learning to see women as sex objects” and is “connected to homophobia.” It’s not just her saying this — the entire feminist movement is based upon a theory that demonizes male sexuality as “objectification,” “phallic imperialism,” “rape culture,” etc. Feminists believe it is wrong for a man even to look at a woman, because the “male gaze” is a cause of women’s oppression.

Did I mention that Laci Green is a San Francisco Democrat?

Does it seem plausible to you that Laci Green, hitherto an enthusiastic feminist proponent of masturbation, dildos and lesbianism, has for some reason now decided it’s OK to become a man’s “sex object”? Has she repudiated all her previous condemnations of male sexuality? And does it make sense that the person who has persuaded Ms. Green to embrace “unequal power in society” is a 24-year-old anti-SJW YouTuber?

Anything is possible, I suppose, but you’ll excuse my skepticism toward Ms. Green’s belated discovery of the pleasures of patriarchal domination. It is not paranoia to suspect one’s avowed enemy of malevolent purposes, nor should we think that feminists are incapable of elaborate deception.

“Feminism does not need men,” as Harvard’s Nian Hu has explained, and does it seem likely that such a prominent feminist spokeswoman as Laci Green would abandon her cause for the sake of a man?

My hunch is that Ms. Green‘s intention is to destroy Chris Maldonado. Exactly how she will accomplish her destructive purpose, I hesitate to guess, but how could her romantic interest in Chris Maldonado be sincere? He is quite nearly the opposite of everything she represents. True, they are both atheists, but beyond that, why does Maldonado think that the “pansexual” masturbation enthusiast Laci Green would have chosen him as her partner?

“Every feminist’s ideal boyfriend is a Hitachi Magic Wand.”

Expect this Laci Green “romance” to end badly.

FOLLOW The Patriarch Tree on Twitter

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.