The Legend of Darwin’s Finches Unmasked

One of the most famous stories in science describes how Charles Darwin spotted the evolutionary significance of the Galapagos finches that now bear his name. And yet he never made this intellectual leap. Now computer scientists have used data mining techniques to reveal how this legend emerged 

The story of Darwin’s finches is one of the most famous in science. It describes Charles Darwin’s fascination with the different types of finches he found on the Galapagos Islands during his famous expedition in the 1830s.

Over time, the finches on different islands evolved independently. In particular, their beaks show remarkable variation having become specially adapted to the feeding conditions in different microenvironments.

The legend is that Darwin carefully collected these birds and organised them by their geographical environment. It was this process that played a central role in persuading Darwin of the truth of evolution.

Or so the story goes. The truth is somewhat different. The finches are certainly good evidence of evolution and commonly cited today by evolutionary biologists. But Darwin did not grasp the significance of them at the time of his voyage, as the legend suggests. He makes little mention of them in his Journal of Researches and does not mention them at all in On the Origin of Species.

That raises an interesting question. How did this legend come into existence? What chain events conspired to credit Darwin with observations and insights into these finches that he never made?

Today, we get an answer thanks to the data mining work of Werner Max at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in Stuttgart and Lutz Bornmann at the Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society in Munich.

These guys say that it should be possible to identify the the origin of scientific ideas by studying the pattern of links between papers that reference them. And the papers that have contributed most to spreading an idea or story should stand out, assuming that the most highly cited papers are the most influential.

Max and Bornmann say this method is similar to spectroscopic analysis. This reveals the most important molecules in a sample by studying the pattern of wavelengths they emit. By analogy to this, they call their method Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy.

The technique is straightforward. Max and Bornmann simply look up the term “Darwin’s finches” in the Science Citation Index, an online database of references listed in scientific papers. They then collect all the references mentioned in these papers and determine their frequency and date. That gives them a distribution of papers by the date and frequency of citation.

The results are straightforward to interpret. The first peaks in this distribution come in 1859 and 1871 and correspond to Darwin’s books On the Origin of Species and The Descent of Man.

Max and Bornmann say that it is no surprise that these books are commonly referenced given their importance. “However, a careful reading of these books shows that they are not the origin of the legend about Darwin finches,” they add.

However, the biggest peak in this distribution dates from 1947 and corresponds to the publication of a book called “Darwin’s Finches” published by the evolutionary biologist David Lack. This is strong evidence that Lack’s book is the origin of legend, say Max and Bornmann.

And it is not the only evidence. In 1982, the psychologist Frank Sulloway published a detailed study of the story suggesting that it was little more than a scientific legend. Sulloway also points the finger firmly in Lack’s direction as the populariser of this legend (although others had mentioned it earlier).

Sulloway’s approach is far more detailed, thorough and time-consuming than Max and Bornmann’s. What’s interesting, though, is that their vastly different methods result in the same conclusion.

Clearly, Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy could be a powerful tool for anybody contemplating similar work on the history of science. Just how much work this approach could have saved Sulloway isn’t clear but it is certainly quick.

Will it help to change the common misconception about Darwin’s interest in the finches named after him? That’s too early to tell.

For the moment, it remains a powerful legend. As Sulloway puts it: “It has become, in fact, one of the most widely circulated legends in the history of the life sciences, ranking with the famous stories of Newton and the apple and of Galileo’s experiments at the Leaning Tower of Pisa”.

Legends indeed!

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1311.5665: Tracing the Origin of a Scientific Legend by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS): the Legend of the Darwin Finches