Aerodynamicists Discover New Form of Lift Generated by Flapping Wings

Nobody has studied the complex aerodynamics of avian wing flapping. Until now…

The Physics arXiv Blog
The Physics arXiv Blog
5 min readSep 18, 2013

--

Why do birds flap their wings? At first sight, the question seems trivial. Birds flap their wings to generate the lift that keeps them in the air. Obviously!

This flapping motion is complex. Birds stretch out their wings during the downstroke to create a larger surface area and retract them during the upstroke to reduce their surface area. This generates greater lift during the downstroke than negative lift during the upstroke.

But many aerodynamicists suspect there is more to flapping flight then this. Their guess is that the process of stretching and retracting the wing during the flapping cycle, enhances lift in some additional way.

They imagine that this depends on the continuous interaction between the wings and the complex pattern of air currents they generate. But these dynamic processes have never been studied in detail because of the complexity of wing flapping motion.

Today, that changes thanks to the work of Guowei He and pals at the State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics in Beijing, China. These guys have created a computer model of a flapping wing that can change its wingspan. They then simulated the flow of air over it during flight.

They say the simulation clearly shows two different components of lift. The first is the easily imagined lift generated by changing the surface area of the wing.

But the other is entirely new. This mechanism manipulates and intensifies vortices around the wing in sync with the flapping rhythm. And this also contributes significantly to lift during flapping flight.

Biologists have known for decades that the way insects and small birds stay aloft is different from the process that keeps large aeroplanes in the air. A standard aeroplane wing generates lift via a steady state process. The cross-section of the wing forces air above it to travel further and faster than the air under it . This creates an area of low pressure above the wing that ‘sucks’ it upwards.

For insects, the process is much more complex. At this much smaller scale, the air is thicker and more viscous, like swimming through honey. This forces insects to rely on different lift-generating mechanisms.

In recent years, researchers have begun to tease apart some of these. For example, insect wings generate vortices that attach to the wing as it flaps, creating an area of low pressure that sucks the wing upwards.

Of course, birds are somewhat bigger and so fly in conditions in which the air seems more viscous than it does for large aircraft but much less honey-like than insects fly in.

Consequently, the flapping motion they use to generate lift is different too. In particular, insects cannot change the surface area of their wings.

So what benefit does this wing morphing ability produce? Guowei and co tackle this question by creating a simplified model of a bird wing. Their ‘wing’ is a thin rectangular sheet that expands and contracts along its length. It flaps by moving vertically up and down at a slight angle to the flow of air.

During the flapping cycle, the wing extends during the down stroke and contracts during the up stroke to about half its length.

Having developed this simplified model they then simulated the flow of air over it and studied the complex patterns that emerged as the wing flapped.

The results are revealing. Guowei and co say that they can reproduce the simple forces that the change in surface area produces. But this does not account for all of the extra lift that flapping generates.

To see where the rest comes from, these guys studied the detailed patterns of air flow that form around the wing and how these change during the flapping cycle. They found that flapping generates a significant vortex above the leading edge of the wing and this creates an area of low pressure that sucks the wing upwards.

However, the process of extending the wing during the downstroke stretches and intensifies this vortex, enhancing its lift.

At the same time, the contraction of the wing during the upstroke reduces the intensity of vortices under the wing, diminishing the negative lift that they can produce.

The result is a dynamic, cyclical process that significantly enhances the lift that flapping wings generate. “The instantaneous and time-averaged lift coefficients of the wing can be significantly enhanced by dynamically changing wingspan in a flapping cycle,” they conclude.

The discovery of this new source of lift could have important implications. It wasn’t so long ago that micro air vehicles could sit in the palm of your hand were nothing more than the idle thoughts of science fiction writers.

But today, flying vehicles of this size are available for a few dollars from almost any toy store. And military research organisations around the world are racing to develop more capable micro air vehicles that can fly for longer, navigate autonomously and send back detailed video images as well as other data.

Most of these rely on conventional lift generated by a wing as it moves through the air, often in the form of a helicopter.

But a micro air vehicle that could reproduce the manoeuvrability and speed of a small bird would be a vast improvement. A first step towards this is properly understanding why birds flap their wings and the forces this generates.

If these kinds of robotic birds ever become a reality, the work of Guowei and co will stand as a small but significant milestone along the way.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1309.2726: Lift Enhancement by Dynamically Changing Wingspan in Forward Flapping Flight

--

--