Back in 2002, a new disease known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or SARS killed about 10 per cent of the 8000 people it infected in southern China and Hong Kong. The severity of the disease and its high death rate triggered panic in many countries where health agencies worked feverishly to prevent its further spread, largely successfully.
Then in September 2012, a virologist working in Saudi Arabia noticed a similar virus in a patient suffering from acute pneumonia and renal failure. Since then, this so-called Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus or MERS-CoV has also begun to spread. The World Health Organisation says it knows of 149 cases that have caused 63 deaths, a death rate that seems to dwarf that of SARS.
The question that public health experts urgently need answering is this: how worried should we be? What is the likelihood of a global pandemic of MERS?
Today, we get an answer thanks to the work of Chiara Poletto at the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) in Paris and a few pals. These guys have studied the pattern of infection and conclude that the immediate threat to global health security is low.
But there are still reasons for concern. They say uncertainties in the way the disease is diagnosed and the possibility that it will evolve into something more infectious mean that diligent monitoring in the coming months will be crucial. Not least because Saudi Arabia is about to host vast gatherings of international pilgrims for the 2013 Hajj.
When it comes to predicting the spread of emerging disease, epidemiologists immediately focus on its essential characteristics. One of the key factors is the disease’s reproductive number. This is a measure of its transmissibility and is determined by the average number of secondary cases caused by a primary case.
Another crucial factor is the incidence of the disease—the number of people who are infected, which can be significantly different from the number of recorded cases.
Good data for both of these factors is hard to come by so epidemiologists have to resort to various statistical tricks to come up with a reasonable estimate of the threat that a new disease poses
Poletto and co have tackled this using a mathematical model of the way disease spreads. This allows them to enter the number of cases observed, the way the disease spreads in clusters and the timescale over which all this happens. The model then spits out a value for the reproductive number and the incidence of the disease.
The results are re-assuring. The model and the data gathered so far suggest that there may be as many as 7 times the number of cases as observed—so that’s still less than a thousand worldwide.
It also suggests that the disease’s reproductive number is just 0.5. That means two primary cases of the disease produce, on average, just one new case. Any disease with a reproductive number less than 1 will die out so this is clearly not self-sustaining.
“The outbreak is not able to generate a self-sustaining epidemic in humans,” they conclude. That means a large fraction of the current cases must come, not from human-to-human transmission, but from animal-to-human transmission instead.
Indeed, virologists announced earlier this week that a camel owned by a victim of MERS also had the disease, the first evidence of this kind of transmission so far. So if you don’t own a pet camel, you’re probably safe.
Nevertheless, there are reasons to be vigilant in monitoring the way the disease spreads in the near future. Poletto and co point out that millions of pilgrims will visit Saudi Arabia in the coming weeks for the 2013 Hajj. This represents a period of increased risk for the global spread of the disease.
That’s also a concern if the virus is evolving, particularly if into a form that is much more infectious. However, Poletto and co are re-assuring on this point too, saying that there doesn’t seem to be any change in recent months in the human-to-human transmissibility of the disease. (Although the data suggest that there may have been a recent increase in the transmissibility from animal to humans.)
Poletto and co end with some recommendations. Since the main concern appears to be animal-to-human transmission, more work needs to be done on how this occurs and how it can be prevented.
They also say that there need to be better and faster ways to identify the disease so that it can be spotted in humans more quickly. That should help to reduce human-to-human transmission.
Finally, they point out that the main mechanism for the spread of emerging diseases like this is air travel (as occurred with SARS and H1N1 in 2009). So health agencies with strong air links to the Middle East should improve their disease surveillance systems so that they can spot new cases as quickly as possible.
For the moment, the chances of a global pandemic seem small; at least until the next emerging disease rears its ugly head.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1311.1481: Assessment Of The MERS-Cov Epidemic Situation In The Middle East Region
This Week’s Top 5 Posts
Follow the latest Physics arXiv Blog posts here